Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35595783›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A generalization of the standard map and its statistical characterization.

Kivanc Cetin, Ugur Tirnakli, Bruce M Boghosian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kivanc Cetin *Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Ege University, Izmir, 35100, Turkey.
Ugur Tirnakli *Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Ege University, Izmir, 35100, Turkey. ugur.tirnakli@ege.edu.tr.
Bruce M Boghosian *Department of Mathematics, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From the statistical mechanical point of view, area-preserving maps have great potential and importance. These maps exhibit chaotic and regular behavior separately or together in the available phase space as the control parameter changes. Several works on these maps, e.g., the standard map and the web map, have shown that ergodicity breakdown causes the statistical mechanical framework that describes the dynamics of the system to change. In this paper, for a novel generalization of the standard map, which we define by generalizing the periodic function used in its definition, we verify that a q-Gaussian with [Formula: see text] for the probability distribution of sum of the iterates of the system with initial conditions chosen from the nonergodic stability islands is robust. We also show that the probability distributions become more complicated and unexpected limiting behavior occurs for some parameter regimes.

Indexed as

Probability

Identifiers

PMID35595783
PMCPMC9122991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.