Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35595775›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Diffuse fibrosis and repolarization disorders explain ventricular arrhythmias in Brugada syndrome: a computational study.

Niccoló Biasi, Paolo Seghetti, Alessandro Tognetti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Niccoló Biasi *Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. niccolo.biasi@phd.unipi.it.
Paolo Seghetti *Institute of Life Sciences, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Alessandro TognettiDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica · ITPiaggio (Italy) · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, we reported a computational study to quantitatively determine the individual contributions of three candidate arrhythmic factors associated with Brugada Syndrome. In particular, we focused our analysis on the role of structural abnormalities, dispersion of repolarization, and size of the diseased region. We developed a human phenomenological model capable of replicating the action potential characteristics both in Brugada Syndrome and in healthy conditions. Inspired by physiological observations, we employed the phenomenological model in a 2D geometry resembling the pathological RVOT coupled with healthy epicardial tissue. We assessed the insurgence of sustained reentry as a function of electrophysiological and structural abnormalities. Our computational study indicates that both structural and repolarization abnormalities are essential to induce sustained reentry. Furthermore, our results suggest that neither dispersion of repolarization nor structural abnormalities are sufficient on their own to induce sustained reentry. It should be noted how our study seems to explain an arrhythmic mechanism that unifies the classic repolarization and depolarization hypotheses of the pathophysiology of the Brugada Syndrome. Finally, we believe that this work may offer a new perspective on the computational and clinical investigation of Brugada Syndrome and its arrhythmic behaviour.

Indexed as

Brugada SyndromeAction PotentialsArrhythmias, CardiacElectrocardiographyFibrosisHumans

Identifiers

PMID35595775
PMCPMC9123016
OpenAlexW4280558398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.