ArticleBiomedical journal2022
The correlation of small fiber neuropathy with pain intensity and age in patients with Fabry's disease: A cross sectional study within a large Taiwanese family.
Article in Biomedical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- NovelJournal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Proton Density of the Dorsal Root Ganglia in Classical Fabry Disease: MRI Correlates of Small Fibre Neuropathy.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Reversing Pathology in an Aggravated Fabry Mouse Model Using Low-Dose Engineered Human Alpha-Galactosidase A AAV Gene Therapy.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Investigation of serum neurofilament light chain as a biomarker in Fabry disease.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- What makes tics tick? Insights into Tourette syndrome.Biomedical journal · 2022Article
- ASIC1a-associated mechanical hypersensitivity in the GlaKO Fabry disease mouse model.Neurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe relationships among small fiber neuropathy, age, sex and pain intensity in the context of Fabry's disease remain unclear. We aim to study the correlations of small fiber neuropathy, age, sex and pain intensity in Fabry patients.
methodsWe evaluated C-fiber function by recording the withdrawal latencies to painful heat stimulus (WLPHS) when each subject's right hand was immersed in a 50 °C hot water bath and correlated this parameter with the patient's perceived pain intensity and quality of life assessed by the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) in a large Taiwanese Fabry family and normal controls.
resultsMale Fabry patients showed a significantly increased WLPHS compared to that of normal controls. Furthermore, male Fabry patients showed a positive correlation of increased WLPHS with patient age. The SF-MPQ of male Fabry patients showed a bell distribution with age, and maximal pain scores were detected between the ages of the early 20s and late 40s. In contrast, the female Fabry patients had variable associations of WLPHS and SF-MPQ with age.
conclusionsWe proposed a probable mechanism by which globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) or globotriaosylsphingosine (lyso-Gb3) is gradually deposited into the small nerve bundles with increasing age, which induces continuous damage and produces injury discharges to sustain neuropathic pain in young male Fabry patients. However, once the small fibers are reduced to a certain degree, they no longer produce enough noxious discharges to sustain neuropathic pains in older male Fabry patients, which leads these patients to have lower SF-MPQ scores. In contrast, female Fabry patients had less and variable small fiber damage, pain intensity and clinical signs/symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.