Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35595321›Full record

ReviewThe European respiratory journal2022

The paradox of immune checkpoint inhibition re-activating tuberculosis.

Mohamed Ahmed, Liku B Tezera, Paul T Elkington, Alasdair J Leslie

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The European respiratory journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Population-Based Analysis of the Risk of Mycobacterial Infections Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. CD14Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohamed AhmedAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa.
Liku B TezeraNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, School of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Paul T ElkingtonNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, School of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Alasdair J LeslieAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa (al.leslie@ahri.org.
Africa Health Research Institute · ZANIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre · GBUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZAUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 201433/A/16/AWellcome Trust 210662/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By attenuating T-cell activation, immune checkpoints (ICs) limit optimal anti-tumour responses and IC inhibition (ICI) has emerged as a new therapy for a broad range of cancers. T-cell responses are indispensable to tuberculosis (TB) immunity in humans. However, boosting T-cell immunity in cancer patients by blocking the programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) axis can trigger re-activation of latent TB. This phenomenon appears to contradict the prevailing thought that enhancing T-cell immunity to

Indexed as

Mycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosisAnimalsHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsLymphocyte ActivationMiceProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptor

Identifiers

PMID35595321
PMCPMC9647068
OpenAlexW4281256287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.