Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35595235›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2022

Transcriptome-wide prediction of prostate cancer gene expression from histopathology images using co-expression-based convolutional neural networks.

Philippe Weitz, Yinxi Wang, Kimmo Kartasalo, Lars Egevad, Johan Lindberg, Henrik Grönberg, Martin Eklund, Mattias Rantalainen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Cancers · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Philippe WeitzDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1788-0716
Yinxi WangDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Kimmo KartasaloDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9470-4783
Lars EgevadDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Johan LindbergDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Henrik GrönbergDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Martin EklundDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5032-5266
Mattias RantalainenDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SEScience for Life Laboratory · SETampere University · FI

Funding

Cancer Research KISwedish Cancer Society, Karolinska InstitutetSwedish e-science Research CentreSwedish Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationMolecular phenotyping by gene expression profiling is central in contemporary cancer research and in molecular diagnostics but remains resource intense to implement. Changes in gene expression occurring in tumours cause morphological changes in tissue, which can be observed on the microscopic level. The relationship between morphological patterns and some of the molecular phenotypes can be exploited to predict molecular phenotypes from routine haematoxylin and eosin-stained whole slide images (WSIs) using convolutional neural networks (CNNs). In this study, we propose a new, computationally efficient approach to model relationships between morphology and gene expression.

resultsWe conducted the first transcriptome-wide analysis in prostate cancer, using CNNs to predict bulk RNA-sequencing estimates from WSIs for 370 patients from the TCGA PRAD study. Out of 15 586 protein coding transcripts, 6618 had predicted expression significantly associated with RNA-seq estimates (FDR-adjusted P-value <1×10-4) in a cross-validation and 5419 (81.9%) of these associations were subsequently validated in a held-out test set. We furthermore predicted the prognostic cell-cycle progression score directly from WSIs. These findings suggest that contemporary computer vision models offer an inexpensive and scalable solution for prediction of gene expression phenotypes directly from WSIs, providing opportunity for cost-effective large-scale research studies and molecular diagnostics. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: A self-contained example is available from http://github.com/phiwei/prostate_coexpression. Model predictions and metrics are available from doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4739097. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsTranscriptomeEosine Yellowish-(YS)HumansMaleNeural Networks, ComputerProteinsEosine Yellowish-(YS)Proteins

Identifiers

PMID35595235
PMCPMC9237721
OpenAlexW3152620848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.