ReviewThe Lancet. Planetary health2022
Pollution and health: a progress update.
Review in The Lancet. Planetary health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 537 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
537 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Impact of Pollution on Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Focus on Air Pollution.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Pooled it
- Residential greenness and birth outcomes: evidence for reduced low birth weight from an umbrella review and harmonized normalized difference vegetation index synthesis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of Ambient Air Pollution on Cardiovascular Diseases in Low- and Lower-Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Global heart · 2026Pooled it
- Environmental exposures in autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a priority-based evidence map, immune-mechanism integration audit and research agenda.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Air pollution and sleep health in middle-aged and older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Sleep medicine reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Air Pollution Mitigation Strategies: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Pooled it
- Breathing in harm: current insights into the effects of air pollution on cardiorespiratory health.Medical gas research · 2027Review
- Serum trace metals across environmental-pressure strata in Campania, Italy (SPES): a population-based cross-sectional biomonitoring study.Future science OA · 2026Article
- Pulmonary function assessment of a community exposed to air pollution in an industrial area in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.Toxicology reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Sodium alginate-based eco-friendly nanocomposites for textile wastewater management.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Individual and contextual characteristics of blood lead level among adults in Port-au-Prince, Haiti: A cross-sectional analysis.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026Article
- Mapping the MicroRNA Landscape of Cadmium Exposure: A Bibliometric and Bioinformatics Analysis of Molecular Targets and Regulatory Pathways.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Machine Learning-Enhanced LC-HRMS Workflows for Suspect and Nontargeted Screening of Pesticide Residues in Fruits and Vegetables.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Use of a capillary blood collection device to monitor exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in Veterans living in proximity to potential sources of environmental contamination.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026Article
- Back to the future: trace lead in ambient air from wood fuel combustion.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026Article
- Poverty-modulated tree equity shapes health burdens across U.S. cities.Environmental science and ecotechnology · 2026Article
- Serum Trace Elements and Self-Reported Physician-Diagnosed Tumor History: A Secondary Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Exposure Study on Susceptible People (SPES).Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Particulate Matter-Induced Skin Injury: A Dual-Pathway AhR-Nrf2 Framework for Epidermal Homeostasis and Therapeutic Targeting.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Beyond the silos: A global evidence synthesis of biodiversity, water, food, health and climate nexus interactions.iScience · 2026Review
477 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Lancet Commission on pollution and health reported that pollution was responsible for 9 million premature deaths in 2015, making it the world's largest environmental risk factor for disease and premature death. We have now updated this estimate using data from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuriaes, and Risk Factors Study 2019. We find that pollution remains responsible for approximately 9 million deaths per year, corresponding to one in six deaths worldwide. Reductions have occurred in the number of deaths attributable to the types of pollution associated with extreme poverty. However, these reductions in deaths from household air pollution and water pollution are offset by increased deaths attributable to ambient air pollution and toxic chemical pollution (ie, lead). Deaths from these modern pollution risk factors, which are the unintended consequence of industrialisation and urbanisation, have risen by 7% since 2015 and by over 66% since 2000. Despite ongoing efforts by UN agencies, committed groups, committed individuals, and some national governments (mostly in high-income countries), little real progress against pollution can be identified overall, particularly in the low-income and middle-income countries, where pollution is most severe. Urgent attention is needed to control pollution and prevent pollution-related disease, with an emphasis on air pollution and lead poisoning, and a stronger focus on hazardous chemical pollution. Pollution, climate change, and biodiversity loss are closely linked. Successful control of these conjoined threats requires a globally supported, formal science-policy interface to inform intervention, influence research, and guide funding. Pollution has typically been viewed as a local issue to be addressed through subnational and national regulation or, occasionally, using regional policy in higher-income countries. Now, however, it is increasingly clear that pollution is a planetary threat, and that its drivers, its dispersion, and its effects on health transcend local boundaries and demand a global response. Global action on all major modern pollutants is needed. Global efforts can synergise with other global environmental policy programmes, especially as a large-scale, rapid transition away from all fossil fuels to clean, renewable energy is an effective strategy for preventing pollution while also slowing down climate change, and thus achieves a double benefit for planetary health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.