Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35594810›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of medical informatics2022

The accuracy of machine learning approaches using non-image data for the prediction of COVID-19: A meta-analysis.

Kuang-Ming Kuo, Paul C Talley, Chao-Sheng Chang

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. A new hybrid prediction model of COVID-19 daily new case data.Engineering applications of artificial intelligence · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The classification of flash visual evoked potential based on deep learning.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kuang-Ming KuoDepartment of Business Management, National United University, Miaoli, Taiwan, ROC. Electronic address: kuangmingkuo@gmail.com.
Paul C TalleyDepartment of Applied English, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, ROC. Electronic address: atlanta.ga@msa.hinet.net.
Chao-Sheng ChangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, ROC. Electronic address: zincfinger522@yahoo.com.tw.
E-Da Hospital · TWI-Shou University · TWNational United University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCOVID-19 is a novel, severely contagious disease with enormous negative impact on humanity as well as the world economy. An expeditious, feasible tool for detecting COVID-19 remains yet elusive. Recently, there has been a surge of interest in applying machine learning techniques to predict COVID-19 using non-image data. We have therefore undertaken a meta-analysis to quantify the diagnostic performance of machine learning models facilitating the prediction of COVID-19. MATERIALS AND

methodsA comprehensive electronic database search for the period between January 1st, 2021 and December 3rd, 2021 was undertaken in order to identify eligible studies relevant to this meta-analysis. Summary sensitivity, specificity, and the area under receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess potential diagnostic accuracy. Risk of bias was assessed by means of a revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Studies.

resultsA total of 30 studies, including 34 models, met all of the inclusion criteria. Summary sensitivity, specificity, and area under receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.86, 0.86, and 0.91, respectively. The purpose of machine learning models, class imbalance, and feature selection are significant covariates useful in explaining the between-study heterogeneity, in terms of both sensitivity and specificity.

conclusionsOur study findings show that non-image data can be used to predict COVID-19 with an acceptable performance. Further, class imbalance and feature selection are suggested to be incorporated whenever building models for the prediction of COVID-19, thus improving further diagnostic performance.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansMachine LearningROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityCOVID-19Diagnostic test accuracyMachine learning approachMeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID35594810
PMCPMC9098530
OpenAlexW4280527611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.