ArticlePloS one2022
Association between gastroesophageal reflux disease and coronary atherosclerosis.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mapping Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Coronary Artery Disease: A Comprehensive Analysis of Multivariable Mendelian Randomization and Shared Genetic Etiology.Clinical cardiology · 2025Pooled it
- Causal Relationships Between Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Myocardial Infarction: Insights From Univariable and Multivariable Mendelian Randomization Analyses.Annals of human genetics · 2026Article
- Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) and Risk of Incident Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Review
- The association of Gastro-esophageal reflux disease and self-reported myocardial-infarction among World Trade Center disaster exposed persons.Preventive medicine reports · 2025Article
- Association Between Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Review
- Study of the causal relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and hypertension through two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Heartburn's Hidden Impact: A Narrative Review Exploring Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) as a Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factor.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Association of Obesity with Coronary Artery Disease, Erosive Esophagitis and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Iranian journal of public health · 2022Review
- Causal effect of gastroesophageal reflux disease on cataracts: A mendelian randomization study.Advances in ophthalmology practice and researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimGastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) typically presents with symptoms of heartburn and acid regurgitation but occasionally manifests as atypical chest pain. Coronary artery disease (CAD) and GERD share some risk factors, such as smoking and obesity. The aims of this study were to evaluate the association between GERD and coronary atherosclerosis and to assess the risk factors for coronary atherosclerosis in GERD patients.
methodsA total of 16616 subjects who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy from 2003 to 2017 and a cardiac computed tomography (CT) scan within one year were included in this study. Coronary atherosclerosis was evaluated by the coronary artery calcium score (CACS). The severity of GERD was evaluated based on endoscopic findings using the Los Angeles classification.
resultsThe proportion of high CACSs (≥100) increased significantly in subjects with severe GERD (p = 0.008). However, the presence of a high CACS did not increase the risk of GERD (OR = 1.007, 95% CI 0.857-1.182), nor did that of GERD increase the risk of a high CACS (OR = 1.018, 95% CI 0.865-1.198). The risk factors for a high CACS in GERD patients included age (OR = 1.087, 95% CI 1.066-1.109), male sex (OR = 5.645, 95% CI 2.561-12.446), hypertension (OR = 1.800, 95% CI 1.325-2.446), and hypercholesterolemia (OR = 1.684, 95% CI 1.213-2.338).
conclusionsAlthough the presence of a high CACS did not increase the risk of GERD or vice versa, the proportion of high CACSs was significantly higher in subjects with severe GERD. Therefore, it might be helpful to assess the CACS in GERD patients with multiple risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.