Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35594278›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2022

Stereotactic body radiotherapy plus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal vein tumour thrombus: A meta-analysis.

Xiao-Fei Zhang, Lin Lai, Hui Zhou, Yuan-Jun Mo, Xu-Quan Lu, Min Liu, Yun-Xin Lu, En-Cun Hou

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiao-Fei ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Lin LaiDepartment of Oncology, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Hui ZhouDepartment of Oncology, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Yuan-Jun MoDepartment of Oncology, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Xu-Quan LuDepartment of Oncology, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Min LiuDepartment of Oncology, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Yun-Xin LuDepartment of Oncology, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
En-Cun HouDepartment of Oncology, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6458-002X
Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) versus SBRT or TACE alone(monotherapy) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumour thrombus (PVTT) remains controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to provide more powerful evidence for clinical strategies in inoperable HCC with PVTT.

methodsWe searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China Biology Medicine (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP Journal Integration Platform (VIP), and WanFang databases for eligible studies. We pooled the results of 1- and 2-year overall survival rates (OSRs), objective response rates (ORRs), and adverse events (AEs) between the two groups and performed a subgroup meta-analysis for study type, control group, treatment order, and the interval between SBRT and TACE.

resultsNine studies with 10 cohorts involving 938 patients were included in our meta-analysis. SBRT plus TACE yielded significantly higher 1-year OSR (RR, 1.52[95% CI, 1.33-1.74]), 2-year OSR (RR, 2.00 [95% CI: 1.48-2.70]), ORR (RR = 1.22 [95% CI, 1.08-1.37]), and a lower progression disease (PD) rate (RR = 0.45 [95% CI:0.26-0.79]) than monotherapy. No significant differences were detected in CR, PR, SD, or AEs between the two groups. Subgroup analysis regarding study type, control group, and treatment order indicated that compared with monotherapy, the combination of SBRT with TACE was associated with an increase in 1- and 2-year OSRs but not in ORR. In regard to the interval between SBRT and TACE, subgroup analysis found that the combination therapy for patients with an SBRT-TACE interval <28 days was preferable to monotherapy in the 1- and 2-year OSRs, and ORR. However, for patients with an SBRT-TACE interval ≥28 days, no obvious distinctions were observed in the 1-year OSR, 2-year OSR, or ORR between the two groups.

conclusionThe combination of SBRT with TACE appears to be better than monotherapy in treating HCC with PVTT and should be recommended for inoperable HCC patients with PVTT.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticLiver NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryThrombosisHumansPortal VeinTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35594278
PMCPMC9122181
OpenAlexW4280513665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.