ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2022
Precise measurement of nanoscopic septin ring structures with deep learning-assisted quantitative superresolution microscopy.
Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fast In Vitro Synthesis and Direct Labeling of Nanobodies for Prototyping in Microscopy Applications.ACS omega · 2024Article
- AI analysis of super-resolution microscopy: Biological discovery in the absence of ground truth.The Journal of cell biology · 2024Review
- Quantifying morphologies of developing neuronal cells using deep learning with imperfect annotations.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2024Article
- Mapping molecular complexes with super-resolution microscopy and single-particle analysis.Open biology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The combination of image analysis and superresolution microscopy methods allows for unprecedented insight into the organization of macromolecular assemblies in cells. Advances in deep learning (DL)-based object recognition enable the automated processing of large amounts of data, resulting in high accuracy through averaging. However, while the analysis of highly symmetric structures of constant size allows for a resolution approaching the dimensions of structural biology, DL-based image recognition may introduce bias. This prohibits the development of readouts for processes that involve significant changes in size or shape of amorphous macromolecular complexes. Here we address this problem by using changes of septin ring structures in single molecule localization-based superresolution microscopy data as a paradigm. We identify potential sources of bias resulting from different training approaches by rigorous testing of trained models using real or simulated data covering a wide range of possible results. In a quantitative comparison of our models, we find that a trade-off exists between measurement accuracy and the range of recognized phenotypes. Using our thus verified models, we find that septin ring size can be explained by the number of subunits they are assembled from alone. Furthermore, we provide a new experimental system for the investigation of septin polymerization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.