ArticleJAMA network open2022
Prevalence of Germline Findings Among Tumors From Cancer Types Lacking Hereditary Testing Guidelines.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tumor, germline, and paired testing in oncology: practical considerations.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Incidence of Germline Genetic Variants in Patients with a Urinary Tract Cancer and Association with Outcomes.European urology oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Landscape of somatic genetic alterations and PAM50 intrinsic subtypes in breast cancer associated with germline pathogenic variants in DNA-repair genes.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- Healthcare professional perspectives on hereditary breast cancer risk assessment prior to gender-affirming mastectomy.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- When Covering and Discovering Are at Odds: How the Logic of US Health Insurance Undercuts the Promise and Equity of Precision Medicine for People with Hereditary Cancer Risks.Journal of health politics, policy and law · 2026Article
- Molecular characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with gastroesophageal cancer diagnosed at ages younger than 50 years.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Article
- Review
- A comprehensive genomic framework for identifying genes predisposing to homologous recombination repair-deficient breast or ovarian cancer.BJC reports · 2026Article
- Return of genome-informed risk-assessment results for common conditions to 23,840 adults and children: An eMERGE network study.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Blueprint for building a patient-centered hereditary cancer program based on stakeholder perspectives.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2026Article
- Somatic and germline genomic variation in thymic carcinomas.ESMO open · 2026Article
- Unique Features of a Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Panel: Expanding Treatment Options in a Value-Based Community Oncology Network.JCO precision oncology · 2026Article
- Outcomes for Patients With SPOP Mutated Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) Treated With an Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitor (ARPI).Clinical genitourinary cancer · 2026Article
- Attenuated Li-Fraumeni syndrome with TP53 p.R181H in a Japanese patient with metastatic rectal adenocarcinoma: a case report.Familial cancer · 2026Article
- Germline pathogenic variants detected by GenMineTOP: insight from a nationwide tumor/normal paired comprehensive genomic profiling test, in Japan.Journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- BASECAMP-1 screening study: a model for efficient enrolment in precision oncology clinical trials.BMJ oncology · 2026Article
- The critical need for robust decision support in the era of precision cancer therapeutics.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026Article
- Article
- Whole genome sequencing-based analysis of genetic predisposition to adult glioblastoma.NPJ genomic medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Germline testing guidelines are suggested for specific disease types or a family history of cancer, yet alterations are found in cancer types in which germline testing is not routinely indicated. The clinical role of identifying germline variants in these populations is valuable to patients and their at-risk relatives. Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of germline findings in patients undergoing tumor/normal matched sequencing among cancer types lacking guidelines. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cross-sectional study took place on August 18, 2021, and included data from deidentified records of patients tested, using the Tempus xT tumor/normal matched approach from November 2017 to August 2021. Records included in this study were from 34 642 patients treated in geographically diverse oncology practices in the US with a diagnosis of any of the following cancers: bladder, brain, lung, esophagus, cholangiocarcinoma, head and neck, breast, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, endometrial, and colorectal. Main Outcomes and Measures: The rate of germline findings (ie, single-nucleotide variants and small insertions or deletions) detected in 50 reportable hereditary cancer genes was calculated for cancer types lacking guidelines for germline testing (bladder, brain, lung, esophagus, cholangiocarcinoma, and head and neck) and cancer types for which germline testing is frequently performed (breast, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, endometrial, and colorectal). Same-gene second somatic hits were assessed to provide a comprehensive assessment on genomic drivers. Results: Of 34 642 patients, 18 888 were female (54.5%); of 27 498 patients whose age at diagnosis was known, mean (SD) age was 62.23 (3.36) years. A total of 2534 of 34 642 patients (7.3%) harbored pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants. Within the tumor types lacking testing guidelines, germline mutations were at 6.6% (79/1188) in bladder cancer and 5.8% (448/7668) in lung cancer. Conclusions and Relevance: This study may present the largest retrospective analysis to date of deidentified real-world data from patients diagnosed with advanced cancer with tumor/normal matched sequencing data and the prevalence of pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants in cancer types lacking hereditary cancer testing guidelines. The findings suggest there may be clinical implications for patients and their at-risk family members in cancers for which germline assessment primarily based on the cancer diagnosis is rarely obtained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.