ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2022
Sigmoid model analysis of breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: Distinguishing between benign and malignant breast masses and breast cancer subtype prediction.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of three arm-positioning techniques for minimizing motion artifacts in breast magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective volunteer study.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
- A simplified method for generating maximum slope maps in ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging.Radiological physics and technology · 2025Article
- Sigmoid model analysis of breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: Distinguishing between benign and malignant breast masses and breast cancer subtype prediction.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is performed to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions by evaluating the changes in signal intensity of the acquired image (kinetic curve). This study aimed to verify whether the existing breast DCE-MRI analyzed by the sigmoid model can accurately distinguish between benign and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and predict the subtype. A total of 154 patients who underwent breast MRI for detailed breast mass examinations were included in this study (38 with benign masses and 116 with IDC. The sigmoid model involved the acquisition of images at seven timepoints in 1-min intervals to determine the change in signal intensity before and after contrast injection. From this curve, the magnitude of the increase in signal intensity in the early phase, the time to reach the maximum increase, and the slopes in the early and late phases were calculated. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used for the statistical analysis. The IDC group exhibited a significantly larger and faster signal increase in the early phase and a significantly smaller rate of increase in the late phase than the benign group (P < 0.001). The luminal A-like group demonstrated a significantly longer time to reach the maximum signal increase rate than other IDC subtypes (P < 0.05). The sigmoid model analysis of breast DCE-MRI can distinguish between benign lesions and IDC and may also help in predicting luminal A-like breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.