ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2022
Training prediction models for individual risk assessment of postoperative complications after surgery for colorectal cancer.
Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI Trustworthiness in the Perioperative Period for Patients with Serious Illness: Scoping Narrative Review.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2026Article
- Contemporary preoperative assessment for colorectal surgery: new insights and developments.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in the surgical management for colorectal cancer: current applications and future directions.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Predictive model for early postoperative stomal complications in colorectal cancer: A systematic review.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Construction of a risk prediction model for postoperative cognitive dysfunction in colorectal cancer patients.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- A scoping review of OMOP CDM adoption for cancer research using real world data.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Automated Identification of Postoperative Infections to Allow Prediction and Surveillance Based on Electronic Health Record Data: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Testing Machine Learning Models to Predict Postoperative Ileus after Colorectal Surgery.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Article
- Prediction of 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality after colorectal cancer surgery using a data-driven approach.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Narrative Review.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2024Review
- Predictive modeling based on tumor spectral CT parameters and clinical features for postoperative complications in patients undergoing colon resection for cancer.Insights into imaging · 2023Article
- Mapping the Oncological Basis Dataset to the Standardized Vocabularies of a Common Data Model: A Feasibility Study.Cancers · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence-enabled Decision Support in Surgery: State-of-the-art and Future Directions.Annals of surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe occurrence of postoperative complications and anastomotic leakage are major drivers of mortality in the immediate phase after colorectal cancer surgery. We trained prediction models for calculating patients' individual risk of complications based only on preoperatively available data in a multidisciplinary team setting. Knowing prior to surgery the probability of developing a complication could aid in improving informed decision-making by surgeon and patient and individualize surgical treatment trajectories.
methodsAll patients over 18 years of age undergoing any resection for colorectal cancer between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2019 from the nationwide Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database were included. Data from the database were converted into Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model maintained by the Observation Health Data Science and Informatics initiative. Multiple machine learning models were trained to predict postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3B and anastomotic leakage within 30 days after surgery.
resultsBetween 2014 and 2019, 23,907 patients underwent resection for colorectal cancer in Denmark. A Clavien-Dindo complication grade ≥ 3B occurred in 2,958 patients (12.4%). Of 17,190 patients that received an anastomosis, 929 experienced anastomotic leakage (5.4%). Among the compared machine learning models, Lasso Logistic Regression performed best. The predictive model for complications had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.704 (95%CI 0.683-0.724) and an AUROC of 0.690 (95%CI 0.655-0.724) for anastomotic leakage.
conclusionsThe prediction of postoperative complications based only on preoperative variables using a national quality assurance colorectal cancer database shows promise for calculating patient's individual risk. Future work will focus on assessing the value of adding laboratory parameters and drug exposure as candidate predictors. Furthermore, we plan to assess the external validity of our proposed model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.