Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35593971›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2022

Training prediction models for individual risk assessment of postoperative complications after surgery for colorectal cancer.

V Lin, A Tsouchnika, E Allakhverdiiev, A W Rosen, M Gögenur, J S R Clausen, K B Bräuner, J S Walbech, P Rijnbeek, I Drakos and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

V LinCenter for Surgical Science, Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital Køge, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark. vial@regionsjaelland.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-9895-7219
A TsouchnikaCenter for Surgical Science, Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital Køge, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark.
E AllakhverdiievCenter for Surgical Science, Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital Køge, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark.
A W RosenCenter for Surgical Science, Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital Køge, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark.
M GögenurCenter for Surgical Science, Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital Køge, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark.
J S R ClausenCenter for Surgical Science, Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital Køge, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark.
K B BräunerCenter for Surgical Science, Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital Køge, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark.
J S WalbechCenter for Surgical Science, Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital Køge, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark.
P RijnbeekDepartment of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
I DrakosCenter for Surgical Science, Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital Køge, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark.
I GögenurCenter for Surgical Science, Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital Køge, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark.
Zealand University Hospital Køge · DKZealand University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe occurrence of postoperative complications and anastomotic leakage are major drivers of mortality in the immediate phase after colorectal cancer surgery. We trained prediction models for calculating patients' individual risk of complications based only on preoperatively available data in a multidisciplinary team setting. Knowing prior to surgery the probability of developing a complication could aid in improving informed decision-making by surgeon and patient and individualize surgical treatment trajectories.

methodsAll patients over 18 years of age undergoing any resection for colorectal cancer between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2019 from the nationwide Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database were included. Data from the database were converted into Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model maintained by the Observation Health Data Science and Informatics initiative. Multiple machine learning models were trained to predict postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3B and anastomotic leakage within 30 days after surgery.

resultsBetween 2014 and 2019, 23,907 patients underwent resection for colorectal cancer in Denmark. A Clavien-Dindo complication grade ≥ 3B occurred in 2,958 patients (12.4%). Of 17,190 patients that received an anastomosis, 929 experienced anastomotic leakage (5.4%). Among the compared machine learning models, Lasso Logistic Regression performed best. The predictive model for complications had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.704 (95%CI 0.683-0.724) and an AUROC of 0.690 (95%CI 0.655-0.724) for anastomotic leakage.

conclusionsThe prediction of postoperative complications based only on preoperative variables using a national quality assurance colorectal cancer database shows promise for calculating patient's individual risk. Future work will focus on assessing the value of adding laboratory parameters and drug exposure as candidate predictors. Furthermore, we plan to assess the external validity of our proposed model.

Indexed as

Anastomotic LeakColorectal NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsColorectal cancerComplicationsMachine learningPrediction modelSurgery

Identifiers

PMID35593971
OpenAlexW4280612469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.