Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35593960›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

Comparison between CT volumetry and extracellular volume fraction using liver dynamic CT for the predictive ability of liver fibrosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Kenichiro Tago, Jitsuro Tsukada, Naohiro Sudo, Kazu Shibutani, Masahiro Okada, Hayato Abe, Kenji Ibukuro, Tokio Higaki, Tadatoshi Takayama

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kenichiro TagoDepartments of Radiology of Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1, Oyaguchikami-machi, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan.
Jitsuro TsukadaDepartments of Radiology of Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1, Oyaguchikami-machi, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan.
Naohiro SudoDepartments of Radiology of Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1, Oyaguchikami-machi, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan.
Kazu ShibutaniDepartments of Radiology of Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1, Oyaguchikami-machi, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan.
Masahiro OkadaDepartments of Radiology of Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1, Oyaguchikami-machi, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan. okada.masahiro@nihon-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6896-8419
Hayato AbeDepartments of Digestive Surgery Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenji IbukuroDepartments of Radiology of Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1, Oyaguchikami-machi, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan.
Tokio HigakiDepartments of Digestive Surgery Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Tadatoshi TakayamaDepartments of Digestive Surgery Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Nihon University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the predictive ability of liver fibrosis (LF) by CT-volumetry (CTV) for liver and spleen and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) for liver in patients undergoing liver resection.

methodsWe retrospectively analysed 90 consecutive patients who underwent CTV and ECV. Manually placed region-of-interest ECV (manual-ECV), rigid-registration ECV (rigid-ECV), and nonrigid-registration ECV (nonrigid-ECV) were calculated as ECV(%) = (1-haematocrit) × (ΔHU

resultsAfter excluding 10 patients, seventy-eight (97.5%) out of 80 patients had a Child-Pugh score of 5 points, and two (2.5%) patients had a Child-Pugh score of 6 points. AUC of ECV showed no significant difference among manual-ECV, rigid-ECV, and nonrigid-ECV. TLV/BSA, SV/BSA, TLV/SV, and RV/SV had a higher correlation with LF grades than manual-ECV. AUC of SV/BSA was significantly higher than that of manual-ECV in F0-1 vs F2-4 and F0-2 vs F3-4. AUC of SV/BSA (0.76-0.83) was higher than that of manual-ECV (0.61-0.75) for all LF grades, although manual-ECV could differentiate between F0-3 and F4 at high AUC (0.75).

conclusionsIn patients undergoing liver resection, SV/BSA is a better method for estimating severe LF grades, although manual-ECV has the ability to estimate cirrhosis (≥ F4). KEY POINTS: The splenic volume is a better method for estimating liver fibrosis grades. The extracellular volume fraction is also a candidate for the estimation of severe liver fibrosis.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsFibrosisHumansLiverLiver CirrhosisRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedComputed tomographyLiver fibrosisROC

Identifiers

PMID35593960
OpenAlexW4280540256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.