Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35593925›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2022

Artificial intelligence-based PET denoising could allow a two-fold reduction in [

Kathleen Weyts, Charline Lasnon, Renaud Ciappuccini, Justine Lequesne, Aurélien Corroyer-Dulmont, Elske Quak, Bénédicte Clarisse, Laurent Roussel, Stéphane Bardet, Cyril Jaudet

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. An AI-Based Solution for Denoising Fast-Acquisition [Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Clinical validation of a deep learning model for low-count PET image enhancement.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Less may be more in PET (with AI).European radiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kathleen WeytsDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Baclesse Cancer Center, 3 Avenue Général Harris, 14076, Caen, France. k.weyts@baclesse.unicancer.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-4829-9139
Charline LasnonDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Baclesse Cancer Center, 3 Avenue Général Harris, 14076, Caen, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5643-1668
Renaud CiappucciniDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Baclesse Cancer Center, 3 Avenue Général Harris, 14076, Caen, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5181-8182
Justine LequesneDepartment of Clinical Research, Baclesse Cancer Center, 3 Avenue Général Harris, 14076, Caen, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7046-1003
Aurélien Corroyer-DulmontDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Baclesse Cancer Center, 3 Avenue Général Harris, 14076, Caen, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9826-6565
Elske QuakDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Baclesse Cancer Center, 3 Avenue Général Harris, 14076, Caen, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0791-9899
Bénédicte ClarisseDepartment of Clinical Research, Baclesse Cancer Center, 3 Avenue Général Harris, 14076, Caen, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0543-732X
Laurent RousselDepartment of Informatics, Baclesse Cancer Center, 3 Avenue Général Harris, 14076, Caen, France.
Stéphane BardetDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Baclesse Cancer Center, 3 Avenue Général Harris, 14076, Caen, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1881-8674
Cyril JaudetDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Baclesse Cancer Center, 3 Avenue Général Harris, 14076, Caen, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2021-1983
Centre François Baclesse · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe investigated whether artificial intelligence (AI)-based denoising halves PET acquisition time in digital PET/CT.

methodsOne hundred ninety-five patients referred for [

resultsPET45 showed mediocre IQ (scored poor in 8% and moderate in 68%) and lesion concordance rate with PET90 (88.7%). In PET45AI, IQ scores were similar to PET90 (P = 0.80), good in 92% and moderate in 8% for both. The lesion concordance rate between PET90 and PET45AI was 836/856 (97.7%), with 7 lesions (0.8%) only detected in PET90 and 13 (1.5%) exclusively in PET45AI. Lesion EARL

conclusionAI allows [

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyArtificial IntelligenceHumansPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals[18F]FDGAcquisition timeArtificial intelligenceDeep learningDenoisingPET

Identifiers

PMID35593925
PMCPMC9399218
OpenAlexW4281264079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.