Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35593712›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2024

Risk Factors for Subsidence Following Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Athan G Zavras, Vincent Federico, Michael T Nolte, Alexander J Butler, Navya Dandu, Mohammed Munim, Daniel E Harper, Gregory D Lopez, Christopher J DeWald, Howard S An and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion: patient selection and workup.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Athan G ZavrasDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9969-5815
Vincent FedericoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Michael T NolteDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9293-270X
Alexander J ButlerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Navya DanduDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Mohammed MunimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Daniel E HarperDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Gregory D LopezDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Christopher J DeWaldDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Howard S AnDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kern SinghDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Frank M PhillipsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Matthew W ColmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designRetrospective cohort.

objectiveAnterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) may be complicated by subsidence, which can lead to significant morbidity including pain, disc space collapse, neural compression, segmental kyphosis, instability, and vertebral body fracture. This study sought to identify patient and procedural risk factors for subsidence in patients undergoing ALIF.

methodsThis study analyzed consecutive patients who underwent ALIF at a single institution with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Patients were grouped as either Non-Subsidence (NS-ALIF) or Cage Subsidence (CS-ALIF) based on the final postoperative radiograph. Demographic variables, operative characteristics, and radiographic outcomes were evaluated to identify significant predictors on univariate and multivariate statistics.

results144 patients (170 levels) were included with an average follow-up of 50.70 ± 28.44 months (4.23 years). The incidence of subsidence was 22.94% (39/170 levels). On univariate statistics, the CS-ALIF group was significantly older (P = .020), had higher BMI (P = .048), worse ASA (P = .001), higher prevalence of comorbid osteoporosis (P < .001), and a more anteriorly placed interbody device (P = .005). On multivariate analysis, anterior cage placement remained the only significant predictor (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03-1.14; P = .003). There was a significantly higher rate of subsequent adjacent segment surgery among the CS-ALIF group (P = .035).

conclusionFactors contributing to subsidence in ALIF included older age, higher BMI, severe ASA, and osteoporosis, while anterior cage placement remained the only independent predictor on multivariate analysis. Subsidence was associated with a higher rate of subsequent adjacent segment surgery. Surgical technique should optimize placement of the interbody cage and avoid overstuffing the disc space.

Indexed as

anterior lumbar interbody fusioncage positioncomplicationinterbody cagelumbar spineosteoporosisspine surgerysubsidence

Identifiers

PMID35593712
PMCPMC10676155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.