ArticleBirth defects research2022
Lesion-specific mortality due to congenital heart disease in U.S. adults from 1999 to 2017.
Article in Birth defects research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Survival From Birth Until Young Adulthood Among Individuals With Congenital Heart Defects: CH STRONG.Circulation · 2023Article
- Lesion-Specific Congenital Heart Disease Mortality Trends in Children: 1999 to 2017.Pediatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) comprise an increasing proportion of individuals living with CHD in the United States (US) although little is known regarding lesion or age-specific mortality in the modern era. Our study aimed to describe current era ACHD mortality rates by age and CHD lesion and provide temporal mortality rate trends for the last two decades.
methodsWe conducted a 19-year analysis (1999-2017) of publicly available, de-identified Multiple Cause of Death data compiled and produced by the National Center for Health Statistics. Age and lesion-specific mortality rates were calculated using joinpoint regression.
resultsACHD mortality rates decreased by an average of 2%-4% per year for all adults. CHD lesions resulting in the highest ACHD-related mortality varied by age. Unlike the other lesions, mortality attributed to single ventricle physiology failed to improve in early adulthood (average of 1.6% increase per year). In decedents age 65 years or older, simpler forms of CHD like shunt lesions became more prominent contributors, accounting for 46% of deaths.
conclusionRates of mortality due to ACHD have declined significantly for adults with CHD, however, continued mortality due to single ventricle physiology remains an area requiring improved strategies to increase survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.