ArticleHuman brain mapping2022
In-scanner head motion and structural covariance networks.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A large-scale heterogeneous 3D magnetic resonance brain imaging dataset for self-supervised learning.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Cellular basis for cortical network aging in primates.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Major depressive disorder on a neuromorphic continuum.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Aberrant network topological structure of sensorimotor superficial white-matter system in major depressive disorder.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2024Article
- Morphological Brain Networks of White Matter: Mapping, Evaluation, Characterization, and Application.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Anonymization and validation of three-dimensional volumetric renderings of computed tomography data using commercially available T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging-based algorithms.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- In-scanner head motion and structural covariance networks.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In-scanner head motion systematically reduces estimated regional gray matter volumes obtained from structural brain MRI. Here, we investigate how head motion affects structural covariance networks that are derived from regional gray matter volumetric estimates. We acquired motion-affected and low-motion whole brain T1-weighted MRI in 29 healthy adult subjects and estimated relative regional gray matter volumes using a voxel-based morphometry approach. Structural covariance network analyses were undertaken while systematically increasing the number of included motion-affected scans. We demonstrate that the standard deviation in regional gray matter estimates increases as the number of motion-affected scans increases. This increases pairwise correlations between regions, a key determinant for construction of structural covariance networks. We further demonstrate that head motion systematically alters graph theoretic metrics derived from these networks. Finally, we present evidence that weighting correlations using image quality metrics can mitigate the effects of head motion. Our findings suggest that in-scanner head motion is a source of error that violates the assumption that structural covariance networks reflect neuroanatomical connectivity between brain regions. Results of structural covariance studies should be interpreted with caution, particularly when subject groups are likely to move their heads in the scanner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.