Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35593313›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2022

In-scanner head motion and structural covariance networks.

Heath R Pardoe, Samantha P Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cellular basis for cortical network aging in primates.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Heath R PardoeComprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0123-2167
Samantha P MartinComprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4239-9921

Funding

Post-surgical resection mapping in epilepsy using convolutional neural networksR21NS117990 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI PARDOE, HEATH · 2020 to 2020
$463k
NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS117990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In-scanner head motion systematically reduces estimated regional gray matter volumes obtained from structural brain MRI. Here, we investigate how head motion affects structural covariance networks that are derived from regional gray matter volumetric estimates. We acquired motion-affected and low-motion whole brain T1-weighted MRI in 29 healthy adult subjects and estimated relative regional gray matter volumes using a voxel-based morphometry approach. Structural covariance network analyses were undertaken while systematically increasing the number of included motion-affected scans. We demonstrate that the standard deviation in regional gray matter estimates increases as the number of motion-affected scans increases. This increases pairwise correlations between regions, a key determinant for construction of structural covariance networks. We further demonstrate that head motion systematically alters graph theoretic metrics derived from these networks. Finally, we present evidence that weighting correlations using image quality metrics can mitigate the effects of head motion. Our findings suggest that in-scanner head motion is a source of error that violates the assumption that structural covariance networks reflect neuroanatomical connectivity between brain regions. Results of structural covariance studies should be interpreted with caution, particularly when subject groups are likely to move their heads in the scanner.

Indexed as

Gray MatterMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultBrainHumansMotionNeuroimaginggraph theorymorphometricsquality controlvolumetry

Identifiers

PMID35593313
PMCPMC9435006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.