Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35593217›Full record

ArticleNeurogastroenterology and motility2022

Automated extraction of anorectal pressures from high-resolution manometry reports.

Mohamed ElWazir, Misha Gautam, Rahul Mishra, Nicholas R Oblizajek, John W William Blackett, Adil E Bharucha

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Optimizing the Utility of Anorectal Manometry for Diagnosis and Therapy: A Roundtable Review and Recommendations.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2023
    Review
  2. Faecal incontinence in adults.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  3. Faecal incontinence in adults.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohamed ElWazirDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Misha GautamDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Rahul MishraDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Nicholas R OblizajekDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
John W William BlackettDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Adil E BharuchaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7644-0390
Mayo Clinic · USSuez Canal University · EG

Funding

Pathophysiology of Anorectal DisordersR01DK078924 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BHARUCHA, ADIL E. · 2008 to 2023
$5.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK078924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring high-resolution anorectal manometry (HR_ARM), the raw data are converted into software-derived summary variables (e.g., rectoanal gradient during evacuation) that capture only a snapshot of the data collected during HR_ARM and are less useful than newer indices, which are also derived from the raw data, for diagnosing defecatory disorders (DD). However, it is cumbersome and time-consuming to extract raw data from the program and calculate such indices. This study aimed to devise a user-friendly approach to extract anorectal pressures measured with HR_ARM.

methodsAnorectal pressures at rest, during anal squeeze, and evacuation were measured with HR_ARM in 180 women, among whom 60 each were healthy, had DD, or fecal incontinence. A reverse engineering approach extracted pressure values from color images in HR_ARM reports. The summary variables generated by the software and a reverse engineering approach were compared with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), paired t-tests, and Bland-Altman's tests.

resultsAnorectal pressures summarized by the software and a reverse engineering method were highly concordant for anal resting (CCC [95% CI], 0.98 [0.97, 0.99]) and squeeze pressures (0.99 [0.99, 0.99) and the rectoanal gradient during evacuation with an empty (0.98 [0.97, 0.98]) and a filled balloon (0.99 [0.99, 0.99]). For most variables, the paired t and Bland-Altman comparisons were not significant.

conclusionsAnorectal pressures can be accurately determined from pressure topography images in HR_ARM reports. In future, this reverse engineering approach can be harnessed to compile large HR_ARM datasets across centers and to uncover newer, potentially more useful summary rectoanal pressure variables.

Indexed as

Anal CanalFecal IncontinenceConstipationFemaleHumansManometryRectumanal weaknesschronic constipationdiagnostic accuracyInternational anorectal physiology working grouppelvic floor dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID35593217
PMCPMC9588692
OpenAlexW4281256861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.