ArticleCancer communications (London, England)2022
Spatial metabolomics for evaluating response to neoadjuvant therapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients.
Article in Cancer communications (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Driving innovations in cancer research through spatial metabolomics: a bibliometric review of trends and hotspot.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Mitochondrial mechanisms underlying spatial immune phenotypes in non‑small cell lung cancer: Implications for ICI response and cold‑to‑hot tumor conversion (Review).Oncology reports · 2026Review
- Metabolic networks in the tumor microenvironment: roles of amino acid and lipid metabolism pathways in cancer progression and therapy.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Advances in plasma metabolomics detection technology and its clinical applications in lung cancer and other malignancies.Holistic integrative oncology. · 2026Review
- Lipopeptide-mediated inhibition of Aflatoxin biosynthesis inCurrent research in food science · 2026Article
- Tumor heterogeneity as a driver of drug resistance and its implications for personalized therapy.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2026Review
- Metabolic heterogeneity in tumor cells impacts immunology in lung squamous cell carcinoma.Oncoimmunology · 2025Article
- On Selecting Robust Approaches for Learning Predictive Biomarkers in Metabolomics Data Sets.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- LC-MS-Based Serum Metabolomic Analysis Predicts the Risk of Tigecycline-Induced Coagulopathy in Critically Ill Patients.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Observational
- Understanding serine and glycine metabolism in cancer: a path towards precision medicine to improve patient's outcomes.Discover oncology · 2024Review
- Metabolic heterogeneity affects trastuzumab response and survival in HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer.British journal of cancer · 2024Observational
- Concentric Hybrid Nanoelectrospray Ionization-Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization Source for High-Coverage Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Single-Cell Metabolomics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Metabolomics Analysis and Diagnosis of Lung Cancer: Insights from Diverse Sample Types.International journal of medical sciences · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence in lung cancer: current applications, future perspectives, and challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Review
- Spatial metabolomics identifies distinct tumor-specific and stroma-specific subtypes in patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma.NPJ precision oncology · 2023Article
- Review
- Patterns of Carbon-Bound Exogenous Compounds Impact Disease Pathophysiology in Lung Cancer Subtypes in Different Ways.ACS nano · 2023Article
- Cancer metabolites: promising biomarkers for cancer liquid biopsy.Biomarker research · 2023Review
- Evaluation of the efficacy and surgical-related safety of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in advanced resectable none small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) differs substantially among individual patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Major pathological response (MPR) is a histomorphological read-out used to assess treatment response and prognosis in patients NSCLC after NAC. Although spatial metabolomics is a promising tool for evaluating metabolic phenotypes, it has not yet been utilized to assess therapy responses in patients with NSCLC. We evaluated the potential application of spatial metabolomics in cancer tissues to assess the response to NAC, using a metabolic classifier that utilizes mass spectrometry imaging combined with machine learning.
methodsResected NSCLC tissue specimens obtained after NAC (n = 88) were subjected to high-resolution mass spectrometry, and these data were used to develop an approach for assessing the response to NAC in patients with NSCLC. The specificities of the generated tumor cell and stroma classifiers were validated by applying this approach to a cohort of biologically matched chemotherapy-naïve patients with NSCLC (n = 85).
resultsThe developed tumor cell metabolic classifier stratified patients into different prognostic groups with 81.6% accuracy, whereas the stroma metabolic classifier displayed 78.4% accuracy. By contrast, the accuracies of MPR and TNM staging for stratification were 62.5% and 54.1%, respectively. The combination of metabolic and MPR classifiers showed slightly lower accuracy than either individual metabolic classifier. In multivariate analysis, metabolic classifiers were the only independent prognostic factors identified (tumor: P = 0.001, hazards ratio [HR] = 3.823, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.716-8.514; stroma: P = 0.049, HR = 2.180, 95% CI = 1.004-4.737), whereas MPR (P = 0.804; HR = 0.913; 95% CI = 0.445-1.874) and TNM staging (P = 0.078; HR = 1.223; 95% CI = 0.977-1.550) were not independent prognostic factors. Using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, both tumor and stroma metabolic classifiers were able to further stratify patients as NAC responders (P < 0.001) and non-responders (P < 0.001).
conclusionsOur findings indicate that the metabolic constitutions of both tumor cells and the stroma are valuable additions to the classical histomorphology-based assessment of tumor response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.