Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35593174›Full record

ArticleLupus2022

Immunogenicity, safety, and antiphospholipid antibodies after SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome.

Flavio Signorelli, Gustavo Guimarães Moreira Balbi, Nadia E Aikawa, Clovis A Silva, Léonard de Vinci Kanda Kupa, Ana C Medeiros-Ribeiro, Emily Fn Yuki, Sandra G Pasoto, Carla Gs Saad, Eduardo F Borba and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lupus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Flavio SignorelliRheumatology Division, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, 117265Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5565-1017
Gustavo Guimarães Moreira BalbiRheumatology Division, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, 117265Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0235-8834
Nadia E AikawaPediatric Rheumatology Unit, Instituto da Criança, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7585-4348
Clovis A SilvaPediatric Rheumatology Unit, Instituto da Criança, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9250-6508
Léonard de Vinci Kanda KupaRheumatology Division, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, 117265Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana C Medeiros-RibeiroRheumatology Division, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, 117265Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.
Emily Fn YukiRheumatology Division, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, 117265Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.
Sandra G PasotoRheumatology Division, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, 117265Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7343-6804
Carla Gs SaadRheumatology Division, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, 117265Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.
Eduardo F BorbaRheumatology Division, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, 117265Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6194-5129
Luciana Parente Costa SeguroRheumatology Division, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, 117265Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.
Tatiana PedrosaRheumatology Division, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, 117265Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.
Vitor Antonio de Angeli OliveiraRheumatology Division, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, 117265Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Luisa Cerqueira de Sant'Ana CostaRheumatology Division, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, 117265Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.
Carolina T RibeiroRheumatology Division, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, 117265Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.
Roseli Eliana Beseggio SantosCentral Laboratory Division, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, 117265Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.
Danieli Castro Oliveira AndradeRheumatology Division, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, 117265Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0381-1808
Eloisa BonfáRheumatology Division, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, 117265Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0520-4681
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRHospital Universitário - Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora · BRUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCoronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) has an increased risk of coagulopathy with high frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Recent reports of thrombosis associated with adenovirus-based vaccines raised concern that SARS-CoV-2 immunization in primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) patients may trigger clotting complications. Our objectives were to assess immunogenicity, safety, and aPL production in PAPS patients, after vaccinating with Sinovac-CoronaVac, an inactivated virus vaccine against COVID-19.

methodsThis prospective controlled phase-4 study of PAPS patients and a control group (CG) consisted of a two-dose Sinovac-CoronaVac (D0/D28) and blood collection before vaccination (D0), at D28 and 6 weeks after second dose (D69) for immunogenicity/aPL levels. Outcomes were seroconversion (SC) rates of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG and/or neutralizing antibodies (NAb) at D28/D69 in naïve participants. Safety and aPL production were also assessed.

resultsWe included 44 PAPS patients (31 naïve) and 132 CG (108 naïve) with comparable age (

conclusionWe provided novel evidence that Sinovac-CoronaVac has high immunogenicity and safety profile in PAPS. Furthermore, Sinovac-CoronaVac did not trigger thrombosis nor induced changes in aPL production.

Indexed as

Antiphospholipid SyndromeCOVID-19Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicThrombosisAntibodies, AntiphospholipidAutoantibodiesCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, AntiphospholipidAutoantibodiesCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin Mantiphospholipid antibodiesantiphospholipid syndromeCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2 vaccinevaccine immunogenicity

Identifiers

PMID35593174
PMCPMC9127455
OpenAlexW4281262436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.