Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35593105›Full record

ArticleBioengineered2022

Differences between the effects of plant species and compartments on microbiome composition in two halophyte

Mu Peng, Chao Wang, Zhiyong Wang, Xiufang Huang, Fangzhen Zhou, Shaopeng Yan, Xiaopeng Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineered, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mu PengCollege of Biological Science and Technology, Hubei Minzu University, Hubei, China.
Chao WangZibo Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zibo, China.
Zhiyong WangCollege of Biological Science and Technology, Hubei Minzu University, Hubei, China.
Xiufang HuangCollege of Biological Science and Technology, Hubei Minzu University, Hubei, China.
Fangzhen ZhouCollege of Biological Science and Technology, Hubei Minzu University, Hubei, China.
Shaopeng YanCollege of Life Sciences, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China.
Xiaopeng LiuCollege of Biological Science and Technology, Hubei Minzu University, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Root-related or endophytic microbes in halophytes play an important role in adaptation to extreme saline environments. However, there have been few comparisons of microbial distribution patterns in different tissues associated with halophytes. Here, we analyzed the bacterial communities and distribution patterns of the rhizospheres and tissue endosphere in two

Indexed as

ChenopodiaceaeMicrobiotaBacteriaPlant RootsRhizosphereRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSalt-Tolerant PlantsSoilSoil MicrobiologyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilbacterial diversityHalophytenetwork analysisplant compartmentsSuaeda

Identifiers

PMID35593105
PMCPMC9275862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.