Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35592856›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

A Somatic Mutation Signature Predicts the Best Overall Response to Anti-programmed Cell Death Protein-1 Treatment in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor/Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Negative Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Jie Peng, Lushan Xiao, Dan Zou, Lijie Han

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Models for Cancer Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jie PengDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guizhou Medical University, Kaili City, China.
Lushan XiaoHepatology Unit, Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Dan ZouDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guizhou Medical University, Kaili City, China.
Lijie HanDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Guiyang Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNNanfang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We aimed to exploit a somatic mutation signature (SMS) to predict the best overall response to anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Tumor samples of 248 patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-negative non-squamous NSCLC treated with anti-PD-1 were molecularly tested by targeted next-generation sequencing or whole exome sequencing. On the basis of machine learning, we developed and validated a predictive model named SMS using the training ( Results: The SMS model comprising a panel of 15 genes ( Conclusion: This study revealed the predictive value of SMS for immunotherapy best overall response and prognosis in EGFR/ALK-negative non-squamous NSCLC as a potential biomarker in anti-PD-1 therapy.

Indexed as

anti-PD-1best overall responseEGFR/ALK negativenon-small cell lung cancersomatic mutations

Identifiers

PMID35592856
PMCPMC9112854
OpenAlexW4225310407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.