Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35592756›Full record

ArticleMedComm2022

Homologous or heterogenous vaccination boosters enhance neutralizing activities against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 variant.

Zhongcheng Zhou, Peng Du, Ning Li, Xinxin Xiong, Shengjun Tang, Qinjin Dai, Taorui Wang, Meixing Yu, Miao Man, Kelvin Lam and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedComm, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhongcheng ZhouGuangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou P. R. China.
Peng DuGuangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou P. R. China.
Ning LiGuangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou P. R. China.
Xinxin XiongGuangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou P. R. China.
Shengjun TangGuangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou P. R. China.
Qinjin DaiGuangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou P. R. China.
Taorui WangGuangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou P. R. China.
Meixing YuGuangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou P. R. China.
Miao ManGuangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou P. R. China.
Kelvin LamUniversity Hospital and Center for Biomedicine and Innovations, Faculty of Medicine Macau University of Science and Technology Macau P. R. China.
Daniel T Baptista-HonUniversity Hospital and Center for Biomedicine and Innovations, Faculty of Medicine Macau University of Science and Technology Macau P. R. China.
Wa Hou TaiSt. Januario Central Hospital Macau P. R. China.
Olivia MonteiroUniversity Hospital and Center for Biomedicine and Innovations, Faculty of Medicine Macau University of Science and Technology Macau P. R. China.
Weng Sam NgUniversity Hospital and Center for Biomedicine and Innovations, Faculty of Medicine Macau University of Science and Technology Macau P. R. China.
Un Man LeeUniversity Hospital and Center for Biomedicine and Innovations, Faculty of Medicine Macau University of Science and Technology Macau P. R. China.
Zhihai LiuGuangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou P. R. China.
Kang ZhangUniversity Hospital and Center for Biomedicine and Innovations, Faculty of Medicine Macau University of Science and Technology Macau P. R. China.
Gen LiGuangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou P. R. China.
Macau University of Science and Technology · MOGuangzhou Women and Children Medical Center · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CNGuangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory · CNHospital Conde S. Januário · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 variant of concern contains more than 30 mutations in the spike protein, with half of these mutations localized in the receptor-binding domain (RBD). Emerging evidence suggests that these large number of mutations impact the neutralizing efficacy of vaccines and monoclonal antibodies. We investigated the relative contributions of spike protein and RBD mutations in Omicron BA.1 variants on infectivity, cell-cell fusion, and their sensitivity to neutralization by monoclonal antibodies or vaccinated sera from individuals who received homologous (CoronaVac, SinoPharm) or heterologous (CoronaVac-BNT162b2, BioNTech) and nonhuman primates that received a recombinant RBD protein vaccine. Our data overall reveal that the mutations in the spike protein reduced infectivity and cell-cell fusion compared to the D614G variant. The impaired infectivity and cell-cell fusion were dependent on non-RBD mutations. We also find reduced sensitivity to neutralization by monoclonal antibodies and vaccinated sera. However, our results also show that nonhuman primates receiving a recombinant RBD protein vaccine show substantial neutralization activity. Our study sheds light on the molecular differences in neutralizing antibody escape by the Omicron BA.1 variant, and highlights the promise of recombinant RBD vaccines in neutralizing the threat posed by the Omicron BA.1 variant.

Indexed as

boosterneutralizationOmicron BA.1SARS‐CoV‐2vaccine

Identifiers

PMID35592756
PMCPMC9095991
OpenAlexW4280617093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.