Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35592745›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2022

An unusual cause of a haemothorax following pacemaker implantation: A case report.

Christopher E D Saunderson, Andrew J Hogarth, Sotiris Papaspyros, Costa Tingerides, Muzahir H Tayebjee

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher E D SaundersonDepartment of Cardiology, Yorkshire Heart Centre, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Andrew J HogarthDepartment of Cardiology, Yorkshire Heart Centre, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Sotiris PapaspyrosDepartment of Cardiology, Yorkshire Heart Centre, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Costa TingeridesDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Muzahir H TayebjeeDepartment of Cardiology, Yorkshire Heart Centre, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9591-3691
Leeds General Infirmary · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Haemothoraces are a reported but extremely rare complication of pacemaker implantation. Haemothoraces can be a consequence of lead perforation through the right ventricle (RV) and pericardium into the pleural space, direct lung or vascular injury during access. Case summary: A 72-year-old woman presented 24 h after a pacemaker implantation with chest pain and shortness of breath. Computed tomography of the chest confirmed perforation of the RV lead into the left pleural cavity with a large left sided haemothorax. Following percutaneous drainage of the left sided haemothorax, the patient became haemodynamically unstable necessitating emergent sternotomy. During surgery, the extra-cardiac portion of the pacing lead was cut, the RV repaired and a large haematoma evacuated from the left pleural space. Despite this, the patient remained hypotensive, and further exploration showed a bleeding intercostal artery that had been lacerated by the pacing lead. This was treated by electrocautery, and the patient's haemodynamic status improved. The RV lead remnant was removed transvenously via the subclavian vein, and the patient was left with a single chamber atrial pacemaker. Discussion: Prompt recognition of RV lead perforation and its associated sequalae, often utilising multi-modality imaging, is vital to enable transfer to a centre with cardiac surgical expertise. In this case, the perforating RV lead lacerated an intercostal artery, and this was only identified at the time of surgery. In order to minimize the risk of perforation, multiple fluoroscopic views should be used, and care should be taken during helix deployment.

Indexed as

case reportcomplicationhaemothoraxintercostal arterylead perforationPacemaker

Identifiers

PMID35592745
PMCPMC9113347
OpenAlexW4229068129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.