ReviewVascular health and risk management2022
Patient Selection for Renal Denervation in Hypertensive Patients: What Makes a Good Candidate?
Review in Vascular health and risk management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Managing Arterial Hypertension in Chronic Renal Failure: Myths, Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Realities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Safety and Efficacy of Renal Denervation for the Treatment of Resistant Hypertension in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Narrative Review of the Literature.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Key Updates to the 2024 ESC Hypertension Guidelines and Future Perspectives.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Impaired inhibitory reno-renal reflex responses in chronic kidney disease.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in Renal Denervation Therapy and Novel Applications of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2025Review
- Anatomic Variations of Renal Arteries as an Important Factor in the Effectiveness of Renal Denervation in Resistant Hypertension.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Review
- Redo of sympathetic renal denervation in a patient with resistant hypertension and anatomical variation of renal arteries.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2023Article
- Effect of Renal Denervation on the Plasma Adiponectin Concentration in Patients with Resistant Hypertension.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Renal Denervation: A Practical Guide for Health Professionals Managing Hypertension.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Renal denervation (RDN) as a therapeutic intervention in patients with hypertension has been intensively studied for over a decade, yet a critical question remains unanswered: what kind of patients are the ideal target population for RDN to achieve its maximum clinical benefit? We herein provide a review of current literature to answer questions related to patient selection to identify populations that will benefit most from RDN, drawing first from human studies but also important clues derived from preclinical animal models. Different aspects that may influence the selection of patients such as the cause of hypertension, the severity of hypertension, concurrent pharmaceutical treatment, renal function, and renal artery anatomy are discussed. Based on current evidence, patients who have severe primary hypertension, regardless of medication or degree of renal dysfunction, who have an accessible accessory renal artery, can achieve a desirable response if a thorough ablation is achieved. In preclinical models, as in humans, RDN shows variable impact, with evidence indicating it does not work in specific conditions such as reduced renal mass, salt-sensitive hypertension, and autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease. The thresholds, however, for indicators are such that it is still not possible to reliably predict which patients could benefit from the technique. Confirmation of predictive factors and identification of biomarkers are needed before RDN can be integrated in clinical practice on clear and reliable grounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.