ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Deep Active Learning Framework for Lymph Node Metastasis Prediction in Medical Support System.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence-Aided Diagnosis Solution by Enhancing the Edge Features of Medical Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- An Intelligent Auxiliary Framework for Bone Malignant Tumor Lesion Segmentation in Medical Image Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- AI-Assisted Diagnosis and Decision-Making Method in Developing Countries for Osteosarcoma.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Auxiliary Segmentation Method of Osteosarcoma in MRI Images Based on Denoising and Local Enhancement.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Auxiliary Segmentation Method of Osteosarcoma MRI Image Based on Transformer and U-Net.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- A Residual Fusion Network for Osteosarcoma MRI Image Segmentation in Developing Countries.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- BA-GCA Net: Boundary-Aware Grid Contextual Attention Net in Osteosarcoma MRI Image Segmentation.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessing the extent of cancer spread by histopathological analysis of sentinel axillary lymph nodes is an important part of breast cancer staging. With the maturity and prevalence of deep learning technology, building auxiliary medical systems can help to relieve the burden of pathologists and increase the diagnostic precision and accuracy during this process. However, such histopathological images have complex patterns that are difficult for ordinary people to understand and require professional medical practitioners to annotate. This increases the cost of constructing such medical systems. To reduce the cost of annotating and improve the performance of the model as much as possible, in other words, using as few labeled samples as possible to obtain a greater performance improvement, we propose a deep learning framework with a three-stage query strategy and novel model update strategy. The framework first trains an auto-encoder with all the samples to obtain a global representation in a low-dimensional space. In the query stage, the unlabeled samples are first selected according to uncertainty, and then, coreset-based methods are employed to reduce sample redundancy. Finally, distribution differences between labeled samples and unlabeled samples are evaluated and samples that can quickly eliminate the distribution differences are selected. This method achieves faster iterative efficiency than the uncertainty strategies, representative strategies, or hybrid strategies on the lymph node slice dataset and other commonly used datasets. It reaches the performance of training with all data, but only uses 50% of the labeled. During the model update process, we randomly freeze some weights and only train the task model on new labeled samples with a smaller learning rate. Compared with fine-tuning task model on new samples, large-scale performance degradation is avoided. Compared with the retraining strategy or the replay strategy, it reduces the training cost of updating the task model by 79.87% and 90.07%, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.