Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35592709›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Optimization of Reservoir Flood Control Operation Based on Multialgorithm Deep Learning.

Bowen Xue, Yan Xie, Yanhui Liu, Along Li, Daguang Zhao, Haipeng Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bowen XueSchool of Water Conservancy, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, Henan 450046, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0212-9348
Yan XieSchool of Water Conservancy, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, Henan 450046, China.
Yanhui LiuYellow River Institute of Hydraulic Research, Zhengzhou, Henan 450003, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7190-8230
Along LiYellow River Engineering Consulting Co., LTD, Zhengzhou, Henan 450003, China.
Daguang ZhaoSchool of Water Conservancy, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, Henan 450046, China.
Haipeng LiCollege of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rapid development of China's social economy, it is the most important task for the water conservancy industry to make use of the existing water conservancy engineering measures to carry out the research on river basin flood control dispatching. Large-scale joint operation of river basins usually needs to consider meteorological and hydrological conditions, historical flood data, multireservoir engineering conditions, and multiple flood control targets, which is a complex decision-making problem. Therefore, electing the optimal operation model of reservoir flood control optimization is very important. In this paper, Luanhe River Basin is taken as the research area, and three kinds of constraints, namely, water balance constraint, reservoir flood control capacity constraint, and water release decision constraint, are set to construct the flood control optimization model. Taking the minimum square of the sum of reservoir discharge and interval flood discharge as the objective function, genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO), Spider swarm optimization (SSO), and grey wolf optimization (GWO) are introduced into flood control optimal operation to seek the minimum value of objective function, and the results are compared and analyzed. Through the analysis of optimization results, the optimization ability and convergence effect of grey wolf optimization algorithm are better than those of genetic algorithm and particle algorithm, and the results are more stable than those of spider swarm algorithm. It has a good model structure and can make full use of the results of three wolf groups for optimization. Through the analysis of scheduling results, the results of genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization algorithm are similar, while those of spider swarm optimization algorithm and grey wolf optimization algorithm are similar and slightly better than those of the first two. Moreover, the search range of grey wolf optimization algorithm for solving long sequence problems is wider and the calculation time is shorter. Therefore, the grey wolf optimization algorithm can be applied to solve the flood control operation optimization model of Panjiakou Reservoir Group.

Indexed as

Deep LearningFloodsAlgorithmsProblem SolvingWaterWater

Identifiers

PMID35592709
PMCPMC9113889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.