Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35592682›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2022

A Study on the Effects of Cognitive Overloading and Distractions on Human Movement During Robot-Assisted Dressing.

Antonella Camilleri, Sanja Dogramadzi, Praminda Caleb-Solly

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Antonella CamilleriBristol Robotics Laboratory, University of The West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Sanja DogramadziDepartment of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Praminda Caleb-SollySchool of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Bristol Robotics Laboratory · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For robots that can provide physical assistance, maintaining synchronicity of the robot and human movement is a precursor for interaction safety. Existing research on collaborative HRI does not consider how synchronicity can be affected if humans are subjected to cognitive overloading and distractions during close physical interaction. Cognitive neuroscience has shown that unexpected events during interactions not only affect action cognition but also human motor control Gentsch et al. (Cognition, 2016, 146, 81-89). If the robot is to safely adapt its trajectory to distracted human motion, quantitative changes in the human movement should be evaluated. The main contribution of this study is the analysis and quantification of disrupted human movement during a physical collaborative task that involves robot-assisted dressing. Quantifying disrupted movement is the first step in maintaining the synchronicity of the human-robot interaction. The human movement data collected from a series of experiments where participants are subjected to cognitive loading and distractions during the human-robot interaction, are projected in a 2-D latent space that efficiently represents the high-dimensionality and non-linearity of the data. The quantitative data analysis is supported by a qualitative study of user experience, using the NASA Task Load Index to measure perceived workload, and the PeRDITA questionnaire to represent the human psychological state during these interactions. In addition, we present an experimental methodology to collect interaction data in this type of human-robot collaboration that provides realism, experimental rigour and high fidelity of the human-robot interaction in the scenarios.

Indexed as

assistive dressingclose proximitycognitioncollaborative behaviourhuman movementhuman robot interactionsafety

Identifiers

PMID35592682
PMCPMC9111015
OpenAlexW4225383433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.