Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35592617›Full record

ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2022

Clinical Outcomes With Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib in a Clinical Trial Versus Real-World Standard of Care in Patients With

Bruce E Johnson, Christina S Baik, Julien Mazieres, Harry J M Groen, Barbara Melosky, Jürgen Wolf, Fatemeh Asad Zadeh Vosta Kolaei, Wen-Hsing Wu, Stefanie Knoll, Meryem Ktiouet Dawson and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. BRAFNPJ precision oncology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. The Health Inequality Impact of Liquid Biopsy to Inform First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Bruce E JohnsonDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Christina S BaikFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Julien MazieresCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Harry J M GroenDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Barbara MeloskyDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jürgen WolfCenter for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Fatemeh Asad Zadeh Vosta KolaeiNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Wen-Hsing WuGenesis Research, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA.
Stefanie KnollNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Meryem Ktiouet DawsonNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Adam JohnsNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
David PlanchardThoracic Group, Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Novartis (Switzerland) · CHNovartis (United States) · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USHarvard University · USInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FRUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Methods: Real-world cohorts were derived from a deidentified real-world database (2011-2020) and included patients with Results: For first-line dab-tram versus PBC, the hazard ratio (HR; 95% confidence interval) for death in unweighted and weighted analyses was 0.65 (0.39-1.1) and 0.51 (0.29-0.92; Conclusions: In this indirect comparison in patients with

Indexed as

BRAF inhibitorBRAF-mutated aNSCLCImmune-checkpoint inhibitorsIndirect comparisonMEK inhibitorPlatinum-based chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35592617
PMCPMC9112112
OpenAlexW4225994592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.