Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35592446›Full record

ArticleTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2022

Demonstrating Benefit-Risk Profiles of Novel Therapeutic Strategies in Kidney Transplantation: Opportunities and Challenges of Real-World Evidence.

Ilkka Helanterä, Jon Snyder, Anders Åsberg, Josep Maria Cruzado, Samira Bell, Christophe Legendre, Hélio Tedesco-Silva, Giovanna Tedesco Barcelos, Yvonne Geissbühler, Luis Prieto and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ilkka HelanteräDepartment of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Jon SnyderHennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Anders ÅsbergDepartment of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Josep Maria CruzadoDepartment of Nephrology, Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Samira BellDivision of Population Health and Genomics, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Christophe LegendreHôpital Necker, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) and Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
Hélio Tedesco-SilvaNephrology Division, Hospital do Rim, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Giovanna Tedesco BarcelosNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Yvonne GeissbühlerNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Luis PrietoNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Jennifer B ChristianIQVIA Real-World Solutions, Durham, NC, United States.
Erik ScalfaroIQVIA Real-World Solutions, Basel, Switzerland.
Nancy A DreyerIQVIA Real-World Solutions, Cambridge, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While great progress has been made in transplantation medicine, long-term graft failure and serious side effects still pose a challenge in kidney transplantation. Effective and safe long-term treatments are needed. Therefore, evidence of the lasting benefit-risk of novel therapies is required. Demonstrating superiority of novel therapies is unlikely via conventional randomized controlled trials, as long-term follow-up in large sample sizes pose statistical and operational challenges. Furthermore, endpoints generally accepted in short-term clinical trials need to be translated to real-world (RW) care settings, enabling robust assessments of novel treatments. Hence, there is an evidence gap that calls for innovative clinical trial designs, with RW evidence (RWE) providing an opportunity to facilitate longitudinal transplant research with timely translation to clinical practice. Nonetheless, the current RWE landscape shows considerable heterogeneity, with few registries capturing detailed data to support the establishment of new endpoints. The main recommendations by leading scientists in the field are increased collaboration between registries for data harmonization and leveraging the development of technology innovations for data sharing under high privacy standards. This will aid the development of clinically meaningful endpoints and data models, enabling future long-term research and ultimately establish optimal long-term outcomes for transplant patients.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRisk AssessmentClinical Trials as TopicGraft SurvivalHumansResearch Designdata harmonizationextension studieskidney transplantationreal-world evidenceregistries

Identifiers

PMID35592446
PMCPMC9110654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.