Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35592441›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2022

Identifying Patient Profiles for Developing Tailored Diabetes Self-Management Interventions: A Latent Class Cluster Analysis.

Haiyan Qu, Richard M Shewchuk, Joshua Richman, Lynn J Andreae, Monika M Safford

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Perceived Discrimination in Medical Care Settings on A1c Data From theHealth education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Haiyan QuDepartment of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0044-589X
Richard M ShewchukDepartment of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA.
Joshua RichmanDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, UAB, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Lynn J AndreaeDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, UAB, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Monika M SaffordDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USCornell University · US

Funding

UAB Diabetes Research and Training CenterP60DK079626 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GARVEY, W TIMOTHY · 2008 to 2012
$8.4M
Building Capacity for Cardiometabolic Outcomes ResearchK24HL111154 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI SAFFORD, MONIKA M · 2012 to 2015
$556k
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL111154NIDDK NIH HHS P60 DK079626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Interventions that are tailored to the specific psychosocial needs of people with diabetes may be more effective than a "one size fits all" approach. The purpose of this study is to identify patient profiles with distinct characteristics to inform the development of tailored interventions. Methods: A latent class cluster analysis was conducted with data from the ENCOURAGE trial based on participant responses to 6 baseline psychosocial measures, including trust in physicians, perceived discrimination, perceived efficacy in patient-physician interactions, social support, patient activation, and diabetes distress. The trial's primary outcomes were hemoglobin A1c, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and quality of life; secondary outcomes were diabetes distress and patient engagement. Results: Three classes of participants were identified: Class 1 (n = 72) had high trust, activation, perceived efficacy and social support; low diabetes distress; and good glycemic control (7.1 ± 1.3%). Class 2 (n = 178) had moderate values in all measures with higher baseline A1c (8.1 ± 2.1%). Class 3 (n = 155) had high diabetes distress; low trust, patient engagement, and perceived efficacy; with similar baseline A1c (8.2 ± 2.1%) as Class 2. Intervention effects differed for these 3 classes. Conclusion: Three distinct subpopulations, which exhibited different responses to the ENCOURAGE intervention, were identified based on baseline characteristics. These groups could be used as intervention targets. Future studies can determine whether these approaches can be used to target scarce resources efficiently and effectively in real-world settings to maximize the impact of interventions on population health, especially in impoverished communities.

Indexed as

diabeteslatent class cluster analysispatient-centered careself-managementtrust in physicians

Identifiers

PMID35592441
PMCPMC9113517
OpenAlexW4280625740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.