Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35592379›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

Evolution in French University Students' Mental Health One Month After the First COVID-19 Related Quarantine: Results From the COSAMe Survey.

Marielle Wathelet, Camille Vincent, Thomas Fovet, Charles-Edouard Notredame, Enguerrand Habran, Niels Martignène, Thierry Baubet, Guillaume Vaiva, Fabien D'Hondt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marielle WatheletUniv. Lille, INSERM, Lille University Hospital (CHU de Lille), U1172-LilNCog - Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, Lille, France.
Camille VincentDepartment of Public Health, Lille University Hospital (CHU de Lille), Lille, France.
Thomas FovetUniv. Lille, INSERM, Lille University Hospital (CHU de Lille), U1172-LilNCog - Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, Lille, France.
Charles-Edouard NotredameUniv. Lille, INSERM, Lille University Hospital (CHU de Lille), U1172-LilNCog - Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, Lille, France.
Enguerrand HabranFonds FHF Recherche et Innovation, Paris, France.
Niels MartignèneFédération de Recherche en Psychiatrie et Santé Mentale des Hauts-de-France (F2RSM), Lille, France.
Thierry BaubetCentre National de Ressources et de Résilience Lille-Paris (CN2R), Lille, France.
Guillaume VaivaUniv. Lille, INSERM, Lille University Hospital (CHU de Lille), U1172-LilNCog - Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, Lille, France.
Fabien D'HondtUniv. Lille, INSERM, Lille University Hospital (CHU de Lille), U1172-LilNCog - Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, Lille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 related quarantine had negative psychological effects among University students. Evidence from previous epidemics suggests that negative psychological effects of quarantine measures can last or even worsen after the quarantine lift. The objective of this study was to assess the evolution of students' mental health and to identify factors associated with mental health outcomes 1 month after the lift of the lockdown. Materials and Methods: This repeated cross-sectional study collected data during the first quarantine in France (T1, Results: We found lower prevalence rates of severe stress (21.7%), anxiety (22.1%), and depression (13·9%) one month after the quarantine compared to the quarantine period (24.8%, 27.5%, and 16.1%, respectively). The prevalence rate of suicidal thoughts increased from 11.4 to 13.2%. Regardless of the existence of symptoms during quarantine, four factors were systematically associated with poor mental health outcomes 1 month after the quarantine was lifted: female gender, a low feeling of integration before the quarantine period, a low quality of social ties during the quarantine, and a history of psychiatric follow-up. Conclusions: The prevalence rates of severe stress, anxiety, and depression, although being lower than during the first lockdown, remained high after its lift. The prevalence rate of suicidal ideation increased. This stresses the need to consider the enduring psychological impact of the pandemic on students as a critical public health issue.

Indexed as

COVID-19mental healthpandemic (COVID19)quarantinestudents

Identifiers

PMID35592379
PMCPMC9110762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.