Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35592352›Full record

ArticleCurrent zoology2022

Empirical studies of escape behavior find mixed support for the race for life model.

Kwasi Wrensford, Jahaziel Gutierrez, William E Cooper, Daniel T Blumstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current zoology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kwasi WrensfordDepartment of Integrative Biology, Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Jahaziel GutierrezThe Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Crested Butte, CO 81224, USA.
William E CooperDepartment of Biology, Indiana University Purdue University Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne, IN 46805, USA.
Daniel T BlumsteinThe Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Crested Butte, CO 81224, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Escape theory has been exceptionally successful in conceptualizing and accurately predicting effects of numerous factors that affect predation risk and explaining variation in flight initiation distance (FID; predator-prey distance when escape begins). Less explored is the relative orientation of an approaching predator, prey, and its eventual refuge. The relationship between an approaching threat and its refuge can be expressed as an angle we call the "interpath angle" or "Φ," which describes the angle between the paths of predator and prey to the prey's refuge and thus expresses the degree to which prey must run toward an approaching predator. In general, we might expect that prey would escape at greater distances if they must flee toward a predator to reach its burrow. The "race for life" model makes formal predictions about how Φ should affect FID. We evaluated the model by studying escape decisions in yellow-bellied marmots

Indexed as

antipredator behaviorescape behaviorescape theoryescape trajectoryrace for life model

Identifiers

PMID35592352
PMCPMC9113366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.