Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35592265›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Ear-EEG Measures of Auditory Attention to Continuous Speech.

Björn Holtze, Marc Rosenkranz, Manuela Jaeger, Stefan Debener, Bojana Mirkovic

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Attention Modulation to Linguistic Speech Units.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The evaluation of cEEGrids for fatigue detection in aviation.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Björn HoltzeNeuropsychology Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Marc RosenkranzNeurophysiology of Everyday Life Group, Department of Psychology, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Manuela JaegerNeuropsychology Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Stefan DebenerNeuropsychology Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Bojana MirkovicNeuropsychology Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DEHearing4all · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auditory attention is an important cognitive function used to separate relevant from irrelevant auditory information. However, most findings on attentional selection have been obtained in highly controlled laboratory settings using bulky recording setups and unnaturalistic stimuli. Recent advances in electroencephalography (EEG) facilitate the measurement of brain activity outside the laboratory, and around-the-ear sensors such as the cEEGrid promise unobtrusive acquisition. In parallel, methods such as speech envelope tracking, intersubject correlations and spectral entropy measures emerged which allow us to study attentional effects in the neural processing of natural, continuous auditory scenes. In the current study, we investigated whether these three attentional measures can be reliably obtained when using around-the-ear EEG. To this end, we analyzed the cEEGrid data of 36 participants who attended to one of two simultaneously presented speech streams. Speech envelope tracking results confirmed a reliable identification of the attended speaker from cEEGrid data. The accuracies in identifying the attended speaker increased when fitting the classification model to the individual. Artifact correction of the cEEGrid data with artifact subspace reconstruction did not increase the classification accuracy. Intersubject correlations were higher for those participants attending to the same speech stream than for those attending to different speech streams, replicating previously obtained results with high-density cap-EEG. We also found that spectral entropy decreased over time, possibly reflecting the decrease in the listener's level of attention. Overall, these results support the idea of using ear-EEG measurements to unobtrusively monitor auditory attention to continuous speech. This knowledge may help to develop assistive devices that support listeners separating relevant from irrelevant information in complex auditory environments.

Indexed as

around-the-ear EEGauditory attentionauditory attention decoding (AAD)cEEGridintersubject correlation (ISC)spectral entropyspeech envelope tracking

Identifiers

PMID35592265
PMCPMC9111016
OpenAlexW4225411564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.