ArticlePalliative care and social practice2022
Scaling out a palliative compassionate community innovation: Nav-CARE.
Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Key themes and approaches in palliative and end-of-life care education for the general public: a systematic review.BMC palliative care · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluating a Train-the-Trainer program to implement a navigation program for older people with cancer across six European countries, as part of the EU NAVIGATE project: a Kirkpatrick multi-method evaluation.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- From the hospital to the community: reshaping the palliative care paradigm.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Strategies used by organizations to scale deep: Lessons from a volunteer navigation intervention.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Taboo, safe spaces, and death sociability: A comparative ethnography of two compassionate communities.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Article
- Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About End-of-Life Doulas.Journal of palliative medicine · 2025Article
- Volunteer navigators to support people with life-limiting illness in the community.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025Article
- Systematic adaptation of public health palliative care interventions across settings using ADAPT guidance: Methodological learnings from the EU NAVIGATE project.Palliative medicine · 2025Article
- Social support sources for people with palliative care needs at home: a scoping review.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Article
- Ethical issues in palliative care: nursing and quality of life.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Interventions for Family Caregivers of Patients Receiving Palliative/Hospice Care at Home: A Scoping Review.Journal of palliative medicine · 2024Article
- Competency development for a volunteer navigation program to support caregivers of people living with dementia: A modified e-Delphi method.Dementia (London, England) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is an urgent need for community-based interventions that can be scaled up to meet the growing demand for palliative care. The purpose of this study was to scale out a volunteer navigation intervention called Nav-CARE by replicating the program in multiple contexts and evaluating feasibility, acceptability, sustainability, and impact. Methods: This was a scale-out implementation and mixed-method evaluation study. Nav-CARE was implemented in 12 hospice and 3 nonhospice community-based organizations spanning five provinces in Canada. Volunteers visited clients in the home approximately every 2 weeks for 1 year with some modifications required by the COVID-19 public health restrictions. Qualitative evaluation data were collected from key informants ( Findings: Successful implementation was influenced by organizational capacity, stable and engaged leadership, a targeted client population, and skillful messaging. Recruitment of clients was the most significant barrier to implementation. Clients reported statistically significant improvements in feeling they had someone to turn to, knowing the services available to help them in their community, being involved in things that were important to them, and having confidence in taking care of their illness. Improvements in clients' quality of life were reported in the qualitative data, although no statistically significant gains were reported on the quality of life measure. Volunteers reported good self-efficacy and satisfaction in their role. Conclusion: The feasibility, acceptability, and sustainability of the program were largely dependent on strong intraorganizational leadership. Volunteers reported that their involvement in Nav-CARE enabled them to engage in ongoing learning and have a meaningful and relational role with clients. Clients and families described the positive impact of a volunteer on their engagement and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.