Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35592240›Full record

ArticlePalliative care and social practice2022

Scaling out a palliative compassionate community innovation: Nav-CARE.

Barbara Pesut, Wendy Duggleby, Grace Warner, Sunita Ghosh, Paxton Bruce, Rowena Dunlop, Gloria Puurveen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Volunteer navigators to support people with life-limiting illness in the community.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Palliative medicine · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara PesutPrincipal Research Chair, Palliative and End of Life Care, The University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, 1147 Research Road, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1063-7190
Wendy DugglebyFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Grace WarnerSchool of Occupational Therapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Sunita GhoshUniversity of Alberta/Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Paxton BruceThe University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Rowena DunlopThe University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0774-139X
Gloria PuurveenThe University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAAlberta Health Services · CADalhousie University · CAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is an urgent need for community-based interventions that can be scaled up to meet the growing demand for palliative care. The purpose of this study was to scale out a volunteer navigation intervention called Nav-CARE by replicating the program in multiple contexts and evaluating feasibility, acceptability, sustainability, and impact. Methods: This was a scale-out implementation and mixed-method evaluation study. Nav-CARE was implemented in 12 hospice and 3 nonhospice community-based organizations spanning five provinces in Canada. Volunteers visited clients in the home approximately every 2 weeks for 1 year with some modifications required by the COVID-19 public health restrictions. Qualitative evaluation data were collected from key informants ( Findings: Successful implementation was influenced by organizational capacity, stable and engaged leadership, a targeted client population, and skillful messaging. Recruitment of clients was the most significant barrier to implementation. Clients reported statistically significant improvements in feeling they had someone to turn to, knowing the services available to help them in their community, being involved in things that were important to them, and having confidence in taking care of their illness. Improvements in clients' quality of life were reported in the qualitative data, although no statistically significant gains were reported on the quality of life measure. Volunteers reported good self-efficacy and satisfaction in their role. Conclusion: The feasibility, acceptability, and sustainability of the program were largely dependent on strong intraorganizational leadership. Volunteers reported that their involvement in Nav-CARE enabled them to engage in ongoing learning and have a meaningful and relational role with clients. Clients and families described the positive impact of a volunteer on their engagement and quality of life.

Indexed as

communityhospicenavigationpalliativevolunteer

Identifiers

PMID35592240
PMCPMC9112317
OpenAlexW4285111267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.