Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35592057›Full record

ArticleBioscience2022

What is the Price of Conservation? A Review of the Status Quo and Recommendations for Improving Cost Reporting.

Thomas B White, Silviu O Petrovan, Alec P Christie, Philip A Martin, William J Sutherland

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Implementing the Kunming-Montreal Biodiversity Targets.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Strategic planning of prevention and surveillance for emerging diseases and invasive species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Use of the terms efficiency versus effective in conservation.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  6. African voices and their role in improving north-south collaborations for biodiversity conservation.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Thomas B WhiteConservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom.
Silviu O PetrovanConservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom.
Alec P ChristieConservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom.
Philip A MartinConservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom.
William J SutherlandConservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom.
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wildlife conservation is severely limited by funding. Therefore, to maximize biodiversity outcomes, assessing financial costs of interventions is as important as assessing effectiveness. We reviewed the reporting of costs in studies testing the effectiveness of conservation interventions: 13.3% of the studies provided numeric costs, and 8.8% reported total costs. Even fewer studies broke down these totals into constituent costs, making it difficult to assess the relevance of costs to different contexts. Cost reporting differed between continents and the taxa or habitats targeted by interventions, with higher cost reporting in parts of the Global South. A further analysis of data focused on mammals identified that interventions related to agriculture, invasive species, transport, and residential development reported costs more frequently. We identify opportunities for conservationists to improve future practice through encouraging systematic reporting and collation of intervention costs, using economic evaluation tools, and increasing understanding and skills in finance and economics.

Indexed as

cost-effectivenessdecision-makingeffectivenessefficiencyevidence-based conservation

Identifiers

PMID35592057
PMCPMC9113343
OpenAlexW4206978725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.