Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35591977›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

Phase II study of intravenous etoposide in patients with relapsed ependymoma (CNS 2001 04).

John R Apps, Shanna Maycock, David W Ellison, Timothy Jaspan, Timothy A Ritzmann, Donald Macarthur, Conor Mallucci, Keith Wheatley, Gareth J Veal, Richard G Grundy and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00278252 (Phase II Study of Intravenous Etoposide in Patients With Relapsed Ependymoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00278252 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

Phase II Study of Intravenous Etoposide in Patients With Relapsed Ependymoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorChildren's Cancer and Leukaemia GroupRan2001Enrolled14ConditionsBrain and Central Nervous System TumorsArmsetoposide, conventional surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A brief history of ependymoma.Neuro-oncology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

John R AppsCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Shanna MaycockCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
David W EllisonDepartment of Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Timothy JaspanRadiology Department, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Timothy A RitzmannChildren's Brain Tumour Research Centre, Bio-Discovery Institute and Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Donald MacarthurChildren's Brain Tumour Research Centre, Bio-Discovery Institute and Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Conor MallucciDepartment of Neurosurgery, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Keith WheatleyCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Gareth J VealNewcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Richard G GrundyChildren's Brain Tumour Research Centre, Bio-Discovery Institute and Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Susan PictonDepartment of Paediatric Oncology, Leeds Children's Hospital, The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Queen's Medical Centre · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBAlder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust · GBCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBNewcastle University · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15746Cancer Research UK 25354Cancer Research UK 28160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Relapsed ependymoma has a dismal prognosis, and the role of chemotherapy at relapse remains unclear. This study prospectively evaluated the efficacy of intensive intravenous (IV) etoposide in patients less than 21 years of age with relapsed intracranial ependymoma (NCT00278252). Methods: This was a single-arm, open-label, phase II trial using Gehan's two-stage design. Patients received IV etoposide 100 mg/m Results: Twenty-five patients were enrolled and included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Three patients were excluded in per-protocol (PP) analysis. After 3 cycles of etoposide, 5 patients (ITT 20%/PP 23%) had a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or objective response (OR). Nine patients (ITT 36%/PP 41%,) had a best overall response of CR, PR, or OR. 1-year PFS was 24% in ITT and 23% in PP populations. 1-year OS was 56% and 59%, 5-year OS was 20% and 18%, respectively, in ITT and PP populations. Toxicity was predominantly hematological, with 20/25 patients experiencing a grade 3 or higher hematological adverse event. Conclusions: This study confirms the activity of IV etoposide against relapsed ependymoma, however, this is modest, not sustained, and similar to that with oral etoposide, albeit with increased toxicity. These results confirm the dismal prognosis of this disease, provide a rationale to include etoposide within drug combinations, and highlight the need to develop novel treatments for recurrent ependymoma.

Indexed as

ependymomaetoposiderelapse

Identifiers

PMID35591977
PMCPMC9113139
OpenAlexW4223956714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.