Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35591920›Full record

ReviewNational science review2022

Wet-chemical synthesis of two-dimensional metal nanomaterials for electrocatalysis.

Zijian Li, Li Zhai, Yiyao Ge, Zhiqi Huang, Zhenyu Shi, Jiawei Liu, Wei Zhai, Jinzhe Liang, Hua Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in National science review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Local-strain-induced CONational science review · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Highly selective photoelectrochemical COProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Electrocatalytic Reactions for Converting COInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. National science review · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zijian LiDepartment of Chemistry, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3107-0568
Li ZhaiDepartment of Chemistry, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Yiyao GeDepartment of Chemistry, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Zhiqi HuangDepartment of Chemistry, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Zhenyu ShiDepartment of Chemistry, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Jiawei LiuSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639665, Singapore.
Wei ZhaiDepartment of Chemistry, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Jinzhe LiangDepartment of Chemistry, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Hua ZhangDepartment of Chemistry, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9518-740X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two-dimensional (2D) metal nanomaterials have gained ever-growing research interest owing to their fascinating physicochemical properties and promising application, especially in the field of electrocatalysis. In this review, we briefly introduce the recent advances in wet-chemical synthesis of 2D metal nanomaterials. Subsequently, the catalytic performances of 2D metal nanomaterials in a variety of electrochemical reactions are illustrated. Finally, we summarize current challenges and highlight our perspectives on preparing high-performance 2D metal electrocatalysts.

Indexed as

electrocatalysisheterophasemetal nanomaterialsphasetwo-dimensionalwet-chemical synthesis

Identifiers

PMID35591920
PMCPMC9113131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.