ArticleJournal of orthopaedics
Partial tear of the distal biceps tendon: Current concepts.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical repair of an atypical midsubstance distal biceps tendon partial tear: a case report.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2025Article
- Decreased Strength, Complication Rate and Higher Satisfaction in Conservative Treatment of Partial Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture Compared to Surgical Treatment: A Systematic Review.Orthopedic reviews · 2024Article
- Exploring current understanding and philosophies of orthopaedic surgery in the sports person.Journal of orthopaedics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with partial rupture of the distal biceps tendon can present with vague elbow pain and weakness. Understanding of the anatomy and aetiology of this disease is essential to management. Patients can present with a single or multiple traumatic events or with a chronic degenerative history. On clinical examination, patients will have an intact tendon making the diagnosis more challenging. Clinicians, therefore, should have a high index of suspicion and should actively look for this pathology. Objectives and Rationale: This review aims to discuss the current evidence in managing partial rupture of the distal biceps tendon with a suggested treatment algorithm. Conclusion: Several clinical tests have been described in the literature including resisted hook test, biceps provocation test, and TILT sign. However, the diagnosis is usually confirmed by a magnetic resonance scan with the arm positioned in elbow flexion, shoulder abduction, and forearm supination and commonly known as FABS MR. Partial tendon tears that involve less than 50% of the tendon can be successfully managed conservatively. Tears that include more than 50% of the tendon are more likely to fail conservative management and would benefit from surgical intervention. It is crucial, however, to involve the patient in the decision making, which is based on their objectives and needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.