Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35591831›Full record

ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2022

Overall survival analysis of > 65-year-old patients with breast cancer based on their molecular, clinicopathological and laboratory factors.

Joanna Huszno, Zofia Kolosza, Jolanta Mrochem-Kwarciak, Ewa Grzybowska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joanna HusznoDepartment of Radiotherapy, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Poland.
Zofia KoloszaDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Poland.
Jolanta Mrochem-KwarciakAnalytics and Clinical Biochemistry Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Poland.
Ewa GrzybowskaCenter for Translational Research and Molecular Biology of Cancer, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of the present study was to characterize > 65-year-old patients with breast cancer according to clinicopathological, molecular and laboratory factors. Methods: A total of 723 breast cancer patients, who had been diagnosed and treated during 2005-2019, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients > 65 years of age (92 patients) were compared with < 50-year-old women (306 patients). We analyzed 398 women from 723 patients. Results: Overall survival analysis was conducted for both groups, separately and combined. Patients with BC aged > 65 years were characterized by G1-2, higher lymphocyte values, lower platelet (PLT) counts and lower NLR or PLR values than patients < 50 years of age. Conclusions: Age > 65 years is a negative prognostic factor independent of other factors.

Indexed as

BRCAbreast cancercheckpoint kinase 2neutrophil-to-lymphocyte rationucleotide binding oligomerization domain containing 2 mutationplateletplatelet-to-lymphocyte ratio

Identifiers

PMID35591831
PMCPMC9103507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.