ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2022
Re-excision within a radius of 2 cm in patients with melanoma of the skin - sufficient for local oncological radicalness.
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Malignant melanoma is one of the most malignant tumours in the human body. Radical re-excision of the tumour bed is a principal part of its surgical treatment. We aim to test the hypothesis that the re-excision with a 2 cm margin in all directions to the scar from the previous biopsy of the primary tumour provides sufficient local control in patients with this disease. Material and methods: This is a prospective descriptive study using STROBE methods, including all 151 patients with malignant melanoma of the skin, diagnosed and treated at the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Dr Georgi Stranski University Hospital, Medical University of Pleven, Bulgaria, in the period 2012-2016. Twenty-one cases were omitted from the study during the observation period due to lack of sufficient data. The re-excision was mainly within 2 cm margins in all directions to the scar from the previous biopsy of the primary tumour. Results: Data of all 130 patients with malignant skin melanoma, diagnosed and treated at our single large centre, were prospectively registered and analysed. These were 67 male and 63 female patients with a mean age at diagnosis of 61.6 years (range: 17-91 years). Using the re-excision within 2 cm margins, we identified only 1 (0.77%) patient with a histologically confirmed residual tumour in the re-excised flap. Local recurrence was observed in 13 (10%) patients. Conclusions: Re-excision with a 2 cm margin is sufficient to achieve local surgical radicalness in the treatment of this disease without compromising oncological survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.