Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35591773›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2022

Using the Nominal Group Technique to determine a nursing framework for a forensic mental health service: A discussion paper.

Tessa Maguire, Loretta Garvey, Jo Ryan, Michael Olasoji, Georgina Willets

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Songdo consensus: Development of minimum reporting standards for studies of intervention in idiopathic anal fistula using a modified nominal group technique.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tessa MaguireCentre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1050-6094
Loretta GarveyDepartment of Nursing & Allied Health, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4985-4280
Jo RyanCentre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3421-6518
Michael OlasojiSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2919-6580
Georgina WilletsSchool of Health, Federation University Australia, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7883-5110

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Nominal Group Technique is a method used to explore issues, generate ideas, and reach consensus on a topic. The Nominal Group Technique includes individual and group work and is designed to ensure participants have the same opportunity to engage and provide their opinions. While the technique has been used for around six decades to assist groups, in industry, and government organizations to examine issues and make decisions, this technique has received limited attention in nursing research, particularly in mental health. This discussion paper describes the use of a modified Nominal Group Technique for a study designed to determine a nursing decision-making framework for a state-wide forensic mental health service. Modifications were made to the traditional technique, to enable participants to make an informed and collective decision about a suitable framework for the novice to expert nurses, across secure inpatient, prison, and community forensic mental health settings. The Nominal Group Technique generated rich data and offered a structured approach to the process. We argue that the Nominal Group Technique offers an exciting and interactive method for nursing research and can increase opportunity for minority group members to participate. This technique also offers a time efficient way to engage busy clinical nurses to participate in research, with the advantage of members knowing the decision on the day of the group. Consideration, however, needs to be given to the duration and effect on participant concentration, and if not actively managed by facilitators, the possible emergence of group dynamics affecting individuals' decisions.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesPsychiatric NursingHumansInpatientsclinical reasoningforensic mental health nursingforensic psychiatric nursingmental health nursingNominal Group Technique

Identifiers

PMID35591773
PMCPMC9321579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.