Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35591654›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Phase Prediction of High-Entropy Alloys by Integrating Criterion and Machine Learning Recommendation Method.

Shuai Hou, Yujiao Li, Meijuan Bai, Mengyue Sun, Weiwei Liu, Chao Wang, Halil Tetik, Dong Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shuai HouSchool of Information and Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056038, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6650-5058
Yujiao LiSchool of Information and Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056038, China.
Meijuan BaiSchool of Information and Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056038, China.
Mengyue SunSchool of Information and Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056038, China.
Weiwei LiuSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7946-5481
Chao WangSchool of Information and Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056038, China.
Halil TetikIndustrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Dong LinIndustrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.

Funding

Handan City Science and Technology Research and Development Projects 19422101008-27Iron and Steel Joint Foundation of Hebei Province E2020402016Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province of China under grant A2020402013Science and Technology Planning Project of Hebei Province 21350101Dthe Equipment Pre-research Foundation No. 80923010401the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities No. DUT20JC19the National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 52175455the National Science Foundation under Award No. 1943445the Science and Technology Innovation Fund of Dalian No. 2020JJ26GX040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The comprehensive properties of high-entropy alloys (HEAs) are highly-dependent on their phases. Although a large number of machine learning (ML) algorithms has been successfully applied to the phase prediction of HEAs, the accuracies among different ML algorithms based on the same dataset vary significantly. Therefore, selection of an efficient ML algorithm would significantly reduce the number and cost of the experiments. In this work, phase prediction of HEAs (PPH) is proposed by integrating criterion and machine learning recommendation method (MLRM). First, a meta-knowledge table based on characteristics of HEAs and performance of candidate algorithms is established, and meta-learning based on the meta-knowledge table is adopted to recommend an algorithm with desirable accuracy. Secondly, an MLRM based on improved meta-learning is engineered to recommend a more desirable algorithm for phase prediction. Finally, considering poor interpretability and generalization of single ML algorithms, a PPH combining the advantages of MLRM and criterion is proposed to improve the accuracy of phase prediction. The PPH is validated by 902 samples from 12 datasets, including 405 quinary HEAs, 359 senary HEAs, and 138 septenary HEAs. The experimental results shows that the PPH achieves performance than the traditional meta-learning method. The average prediction accuracy of PPH in all, quinary, senary, and septenary HEAs is 91.6%, 94.3%, 93.1%, and 95.8%, respectively.

Indexed as

criterionhigh-entropy alloysmachine learning recommendationphase prediction

Identifiers

PMID35591654
PMCPMC9105637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.