Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35591410›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Compressive and Flexural Strength of 3D-Printed and Conventional Resins Designated for Interim Fixed Dental Prostheses: An In Vitro Comparison.

Mihaela Pantea, Robert Cătălin Ciocoiu, Maria Greabu, Alexandra Ripszky Totan, Marina Imre, Ana Maria Cristina Țâncu, Ruxandra Sfeatcu, Tudor Claudiu Spînu, Radu Ilinca, Alexandru Eugen Petre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Comparative In Vitro Study of Materials for Provisional Restorations Manufactured With Additive (3Dprinting), Subtractive (Milling), and Conventional Techniques.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The Accuracy of 3D-Printed Fixed Dental Restorations.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Development of a semi-anthropomorphic photoacoustic calcaneus phantom based on nano computed tomography and stereolithography 3D printing.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mihaela PanteaDepartment of Fixed Prosthodontics and Occlusology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 17-23 Plevnei Street, 20221 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-2402-8772
Robert Cătălin CiocoiuDepartment of Metallic Materials Science, Physical Metallurgy, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, J Building, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-2333-0099
Maria GreabuDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 17-23 Plevnei Street, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Alexandra Ripszky TotanDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 17-23 Plevnei Street, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-4345-282X
Marina ImreDepartment of Complete Denture, Faculty of Dental Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 17-23 Plevnei Street, 020221 Bucharest, Romania.
Ana Maria Cristina ȚâncuDepartment of Complete Denture, Faculty of Dental Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 17-23 Plevnei Street, 020221 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9973-1759
Ruxandra SfeatcuDepartment of Oral Health and Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 17-23 Calea Plevnei Street, 010221 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9391-7341
Tudor Claudiu SpînuDepartment of Fixed Prosthodontics and Occlusology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 17-23 Plevnei Street, 20221 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-1576-3898
Radu IlincaDepartment of Biophysics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 17-23 Calea Plevnei Street, 010221 Bucharest, Romania.
Alexandru Eugen PetreDepartment of Fixed Prosthodontics and Occlusology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 17-23 Plevnei Street, 20221 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5994-0000

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A provisionalization sequence is essential for obtaining a predictable final prosthetic outcome. An assessment of the mechanical behavior of interim prosthetic materials could orient clinicians towards selecting an appropriate material for each clinical case. The aim of this study was to comparatively evaluate the mechanical behavior-with compressive and three-point flexural tests-of certain 3D-printed and conventional resins used to obtain interim fixed dental prostheses. Four interim resin materials were investigated: two 3D-printed resins and two conventional resins (an auto-polymerized resin and a pressure/heat-cured acrylic resin). Cylindrically shaped samples (25 × 25 mm/diameter × height) were obtained for the compression tests and bar-shaped samples (80 × 20 × 5 mm/length × width × thickness) were produced for the flexural tests, observing the producers' recommendations. The resulting 40 resin samples were subjected to mechanical tests using a universal testing machine. Additionally, a fractographic analysis of failed samples in bending was performed. The results showed that the additive manufactured samples exhibited higher elastic moduli (2.4 ± 0.02 GPa and 2.6 ± 0.18 GPa) than the conventional samples (1.3 ± 0.19 GPa and 1.3 ± 0.38 GPa), as well as a higher average bending strength (141 ± 17 MPa and 143 ± 15 MPa) when compared to the conventional samples (88 ± 10 MPa and 76 ± 7 MPa); the results also suggested that the materials were more homogenous when produced via additive manufacturing.

Indexed as

3D printingcompressive strengthdental materialsflexural strengthinterim dental prosthesismechanical testspolymers

Identifiers

PMID35591410
PMCPMC9104158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.