ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Scanning Distance Influence on the Intraoral Scanning Accuracy-An In Vitro Study.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accuracy assessment of removable partial denture frameworks fabricated by selective laser melting using two different workflows: A cross-over clinical study.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- Comparative evaluation of effect of rescanning and cut out & stitching with uninterrupted single scan on the accuracy of digital impressions - An in vitro study.Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society · 2026Article
- Mapping Error Propagation in Intraoral Scanning Using Reason's Swiss-Cheese Model: An In Vitro Study of Precision Under Repeatability Conditions.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Trueness and the amount of clinical adjustment for zirconia crowns fabricated by digital light processing at different build angles: a within-patient clinical study.The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2026Article
- Influence of intraoral scan extension on the accuracy of impressions with 3d-printed identical single tooth preparations.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Effects of silica particle size on the mechanical, surface and printing-trueness properties of 3D-printing dental resin.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The effect of cavity depth on accuracy of intraoral scanners in intra-coronal restorations.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Enhancing Intraoral Scanning Accuracy: From the Influencing Factors to a Procedural Guideline.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Trueness and depth discrepancy of post-space scans using an intraoral scanner: influence of preparation dimensions: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Comparison of trueness, time, and number of images among different denture digitization protocols.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2025Article
- Effect of scan path on accuracy of complete arch intraoral scan.The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2024Article
- Trueness comparison of intraoral scans for diverse arch lengths in pediatric dental models.Journal of dental sciences · 2024Article
- Kennedy class III and IV dental arches: Trueness analysis of digitization methods and 3D-printing step.Brazilian dental journal · 2024Article
- Trueness of intraoral scanning for different tooth-size arch-length deficiencies.Journal of dental sciences · 2024Article
- Effect of angulation on the 3D trueness of conventional and digital implant impressions for multi-unit restorations.The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2023Article
- Effect of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanners: a meta-analysis ofThe journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2023Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Factors That Influence the Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Accuracy of intraoral scanning versus conventional impressions for partial edentulous patients with maxillary defects.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Accuracy of intraoral scanning methods for maxillary Kennedy class I arch.Journal of dental sciences · 2023Article
- [Research progress of digital occlusion setup in orthognathic surgery].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intraoral scanners (IOS) have reached a point where their impact in the dental office cannot be denied. The distance between the tip of the IOS and the preparation may have implications on the accuracy of the digital model. The objective of this study was to evaluate the differences in accuracy between digital impressions in the scenario of different scanning distances. Twenty consecutive scans were performed at five predetermined distances: 5 mm, 10 mm, 15 mm, 20 mm and 23 mm by a single operator. The scanning distance of 10 mm displayed the best accuracy with an overall trueness value of 23.05 μm and precision value of 4.2 μm. The drawn conclusion was that increased scanning distances can decrease the accuracy of a digital impression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.