Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35591316›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Recent Progress in Single and Combined Porosity-Evaluation Techniques for Porous Materials.

Yuqing Wang, Bo Zhou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuqing WangJiangsu Key Laboratory of Micro and Nano Heat Fluid Flow Technology and Energy Application, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5522-8860
Bo ZhouJiangsu Key Laboratory of Micro and Nano Heat Fluid Flow Technology and Energy Application, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4109-6750

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 51806147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate determination of the porosity and specific surface area of porous materials such as shale and cement plays a key role in gas-energy-storage estimation and exploitation, building-heat and humidity-transfer investigation, and permeability-characteristics evaluation. Therefore, it is crucial to select appropriate measurement methods to accurately study the porosity, as well as other properties, of porous materials. In this review, various porosity-measurement methods are discussed. The most recent research findings and progress in combined methodologies are introduced and summarized. The measurement medium and chemical composition of the sample affect the porosity-measurement results. Therefore, depending on the measurement properties of different methods and the characteristics of the sample, an appropriate method can be selected. Furthermore, various methods can be combined to obtain more accurate measurement results than individual methods.

Indexed as

adsorptionCTgas expansionMIPNMRporosity measurementSANSSEMWIP

Identifiers

PMID35591316
PMCPMC9099696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.