ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Analysis of Deep Learning-Based Phase Retrieval Algorithm Performance for Quantitative Phase Imaging Microscopy.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in Microfluidics for Single Red Blood Cell Analysis.Biosensors · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative phase imaging has been of interest to the science and engineering community and has been applied in multiple research fields and applications. Recently, the data-driven approach of artificial intelligence has been utilized in several optical applications, including phase retrieval. However, phase images recovered from artificial intelligence are questionable in their correctness and reliability. Here, we propose a theoretical framework to analyze and quantify the performance of a deep learning-based phase retrieval algorithm for quantitative phase imaging microscopy by comparing recovered phase images to their theoretical phase profile in terms of their correctness. This study has employed both lossless and lossy samples, including uniform plasmonic gold sensors and dielectric layer samples; the plasmonic samples are lossy, whereas the dielectric layers are lossless. The uniform samples enable us to quantify the theoretical phase since they are established and well understood. In addition, a context aggregation network has been employed to demonstrate the phase image regression. Several imaging planes have been simulated serving as input and the label for network training, including a back focal plane image, an image at the image plane, and images when the microscope sample is axially defocused. The back focal plane image plays an essential role in phase retrieval for the plasmonic samples, whereas the dielectric layer requires both image plane and back focal plane information to retrieve the phase profile correctly. Here, we demonstrate that phase images recovered using deep learning can be robust and reliable depending on the sample and the input to the deep learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.