Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35591220›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Analysis of Deep Learning-Based Phase Retrieval Algorithm Performance for Quantitative Phase Imaging Microscopy.

Sarinporn Visitsattapongse, Kitsada Thadson, Suejit Pechprasarn, Nuntachai Thongpance

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarinporn VisitsattapongseDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand.
Kitsada ThadsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand.
Suejit PechprasarnCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Rangsit University, Pathum Thani 12000, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-9105-8627
Nuntachai ThongpanceCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Rangsit University, Pathum Thani 12000, Thailand.
King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang · THRangsit University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative phase imaging has been of interest to the science and engineering community and has been applied in multiple research fields and applications. Recently, the data-driven approach of artificial intelligence has been utilized in several optical applications, including phase retrieval. However, phase images recovered from artificial intelligence are questionable in their correctness and reliability. Here, we propose a theoretical framework to analyze and quantify the performance of a deep learning-based phase retrieval algorithm for quantitative phase imaging microscopy by comparing recovered phase images to their theoretical phase profile in terms of their correctness. This study has employed both lossless and lossy samples, including uniform plasmonic gold sensors and dielectric layer samples; the plasmonic samples are lossy, whereas the dielectric layers are lossless. The uniform samples enable us to quantify the theoretical phase since they are established and well understood. In addition, a context aggregation network has been employed to demonstrate the phase image regression. Several imaging planes have been simulated serving as input and the label for network training, including a back focal plane image, an image at the image plane, and images when the microscope sample is axially defocused. The back focal plane image plays an essential role in phase retrieval for the plasmonic samples, whereas the dielectric layer requires both image plane and back focal plane information to retrieve the phase profile correctly. Here, we demonstrate that phase images recovered using deep learning can be robust and reliable depending on the sample and the input to the deep learning.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMicroscopyAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceReproducibility of Resultsinstrumentationphase retrieval algorithmquantitative phase imagingsurface plasmon microscopy

Identifiers

PMID35591220
PMCPMC9104860
OpenAlexW4229371901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.