Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35591209›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Modeling and Fault Detection of Brushless Direct Current Motor by Deep Learning Sensor Data Fusion.

Priscile Suawa, Tenia Meisel, Marcel Jongmanns, Michael Huebner, Marc Reichenbach

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Priscile SuawaDepartment of Computer Engineering, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, 03046 Cottbus, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0404-2043
Tenia MeiselFraunhofer Institute for Photonic Microsystems, 01109 Dresden, Germany.
Marcel JongmannsFraunhofer Institute for Photonic Microsystems, 01109 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8595-7749
Michael HuebnerDepartment of Computer Engineering, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, 03046 Cottbus, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1790-3869
Marc ReichenbachDepartment of Computer Engineering, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, 03046 Cottbus, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9687-6247
Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg · DEFraunhofer Institute for Photonic Microsystems · DE

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education and Research 16ES1128K.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Only with new sensor concepts in a network, which go far beyond what the current state-of-the-art can offer, can current and future requirements for flexibility, safety, and security be met. The combination of data from many sensors allows a richer representation of the observed phenomenon, e.g., system degradation, which can facilitate analysis and decision-making processes. This work addresses the topic of predictive maintenance by exploiting sensor data fusion and artificial intelligence-based analysis. With a dataset such as vibration and sound from sensors, we focus on studying paradigms that orchestrate the most optimal combination of sensors with deep learning sensor fusion algorithms to enable predictive maintenance. In our experimental setup, we used raw data obtained from two sensors, a microphone, and an accelerometer installed on a brushless direct current (BLDC) motor. The data from each sensor were processed individually and, in a second step, merged to create a solid base for analysis. To diagnose BLDC motor faults, this work proposes to use data-level sensor fusion with deep learning methods such as deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) for their ability to automatically extract relevant information from the input data, the long short-term memory method (LSTM), and convolutional long short-term memory (CNN-LSTM), a combination of the two previous methods. The results show that in our setup, sound signals outperform vibrations when used individually for training. However, without any feature selection/extraction step, the accuracy of the models improves with data fusion and reaches 98.8%, 93.5%, and 73.6% for the DCNN, CNN-LSTM, and LSTM methods, respectively, 98.8% being a performance that, according to our reading, has never been reached in the analysis of the faults of a BLDC motor without first going through the extraction of the characteristics and their fusion by traditional methods. These results show that it is possible to work with raw data from multiple sensors and achieve good results using deep learning methods without spending time and resources on selecting appropriate features to extract and methods to use for feature extraction and data fusion.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeep LearningAlgorithmsElectricityNeural Networks, Computeraccelerometerbrushless direct current motordeep convolutional neural networksdeep learning sensor fusionfaults detectionlong short-term memorymicrophone

Identifiers

PMID35591209
PMCPMC9099980
OpenAlexW4229000217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.