Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35591141›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Validation of Running Gait Event Detection Algorithms in a Semi-Uncontrolled Environment.

Seth R Donahue, Michael E Hahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Seth R DonahueBowerman Sports Science Center, Department of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97404, USA.
Michael E HahnBowerman Sports Science Center, Department of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97404, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5024-700X

Funding

Casio (Japan) 30757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of lightweight portable sensors and algorithms for the identification of gait events at steady-state running speeds can be translated into the real-world environment. However, the output of these algorithms needs to be validated. The purpose of this study was to validate the identification of running gait events using data from Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) in a semi-uncontrolled environment. Fifteen healthy runners were recruited for this study, with varied running experience and age. Force-sensing insoles measured normal foot-shoe forces and provided a standard for identification of gait events. Three IMUs were mounted to the participant, two bilaterally on the dorsal aspect of the foot and one clipped to the back of each participant’s waistband, approximating their sacrum. The identification of gait events from the foot-mounted IMU was more accurate than from the sacral-mounted IMU. At running speeds <3.57 m s−1, the sacral-mounted IMU identified contact duration as well as the foot-mounted IMU. However, at speeds >3.57 m s−1, the sacral-mounted IMU overestimated foot contact duration. This study demonstrates that at controlled paces over level ground, we can identify gait events and measure contact time across a range of running skill levels.

Indexed as

RunningAlgorithmsBiomechanical PhenomenaFootGaitHumansbiomechanicscontact timegait eventsInertial Measurement Unitrunning

Identifiers

PMID35591141
PMCPMC9101903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.